Ninety One portfolio manager bets on Treasuries amid inflation concerns
While most of Wall Street has been piling into one side of the Treasury trade, a portfolio manager at Ninety One is doing something different. Jason Borbora-Sheen is betting that long-dated Treasuries are oversold and due for a comeback, built on a thesis that inflation is heading lower and that Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s credibility will be vindicated.
The trade and the thesis
Borbora-Sheen’s strategy centers on a relative bet: 30-year Treasuries outperforming 10-year notes. That runs directly against the grain of the yield-curve steepener trade, which has been the consensus play among fixed-income managers for months.
Since July 2026, long-dated bonds have sold off sharply. That selloff created what Borbora-Sheen apparently sees as a mispricing, an opportunity to buy 30-year paper at levels that overcompensate for inflation risk.
The signal, in his reading, is that Warsh’s hawkish posture on inflation is more than rhetoric. Warsh has been emphatic about having “no soft inflation target,” a phrase designed to distinguish his approach from what some critics saw as a tolerance for above-target inflation during prior Fed leadership.
Warsh’s credibility gap
The Fed has kept its benchmark rate steady in the range of 3.50% to 3.75% during recent meetings, a level that suggests the central bank believes it has done enough tightening to bring inflation toward its 2% target. But progress toward that target has been uneven, sending mixed signals that have left bond traders uncertain about the rate path ahead.
Warsh’s communications in July 2026 triggered volatile swings in long-dated yields, a sign that investors were re-evaluating whether the Fed chair’s words would translate into action.
If Warsh’s policies do succeed in bringing inflation down durably, the market will have to reprice its doubts. That repricing would flow disproportionately into long-dated bonds, exactly where Borbora-Sheen is positioned.
What the fixed-income crowd is watching
Ninety One, the South Africa-born asset manager with a track record in active fixed-income strategies, manages assets across global fixed income, equities, and multi-asset strategies. Borbora-Sheen’s trade reflects that institutional willingness to go against the crowd when the risk-reward calculus looks favorable.
The key variable to watch is upcoming inflation data. If the next few readings show continued progress toward the 2% target, Borbora-Sheen’s trade could start working quickly. On the other hand, any resurgence in price pressures would validate the skeptics and extend the selloff that has defined the long end since midsummer.
If Warsh opts to cut rates later this year on the back of improving inflation, that would be a tailwind for the entire curve but especially for the 30-year, which stands to benefit most from lower rate expectations and declining term premium.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

