Bitcoin Shrugged Off Good CPI and PPI Data: Why Is BTC Still Stalling?
Bitcoin investors received what should have been a fairly supportive and positive combination of macroeconomic data in the past week, starting with the weak US jobs report last Friday.
However, the asset failed to produce any significant gains, again. Moreover, it has lost some traction and is actually down on a weekly scale, currently struggling to remain above $63,000. Why is that?
Why No Gains, BTC?
After the jobs report from a week ago, which managed to push BTC beyond $65,000 briefly, all eyes turned to the US CPI data on Wednesday. As reported, the July numbers came broadly in line with expectations, initially leading to a brief rebound to $64,400 before Bitcoin gave the gains back and resumed the downtrend it was already on as the business week progressed.
The subsequent PPI report was even more encouraging, with producer prices remaining flat month-over-month, contrary to expectations of a 0.2% increase. CryptoQuant weighed in on the matter and added that Treasury yields declined, while US equities posted some gains. Under normal circumstances, this combination should have provided some relief for risk-on assets, but BTC has failed to make a move upward.
Their analysis indicated that the explanation may have less to do with the macro environment and considerably more to do with a simple problem: Bitcoin buyers are nowhere to be seen in the spot market.
The report explained that such trading activity remains subdued, while flows into the US BTC ETFs have remained relatively weak in the past several days. Even more importantly, the Coinbase Premium Index continues to be almost entirely in negative territory for three months, and it now sits at around -0.1%.
The analysts added that the seven-day average spot trading volume across major exchanges dropped from nearly $9 billion in late June to under $4 billion on August 12. This 55% decline came even as BTC’s price recovered 8% within the same timeframe.
You may also like:
- Solana Overtakes Bitcoin and Ether in GSR’s Latest Crypto Portfolio Shake-Up
- Bitcoin Rebound Faces Risk as Futures Demand Outpaces Spot Buying: Analysts
- ETFs Are Buying, But Who Is Selling? Inside Bitcoin’s Tug-of-War
The Real Price Test
CQ identified Bitcoin’s short-term holder cost basis at around $68,700 as a major obstacle to the asset’s path forward, as it’s a level at which investors who bought relatively recently could exit at breakeven if the cryptocurrency reaches it.
As such, a surge to $65,000 won’t be enough to confirm that the broader trend has changed. They believe a more sustainable recovery would require several developments at once: renewed, significant ETF inflows, such as those from the previous week; stronger spot volume; a return to a positive Coinbase Premium; and a decisive break above $68,700.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.
Crypto prices
More
