Kalshi’s Daily Perp Open Interest Hits Record $17.98 Million
Kalshi’s perpetual futures product went live on June 3 with BTCPERP becoming the first perp contract cleared by the CFTC for US traders. Ether went live on June 4, XRP on June 10 and the roster now covers 13 crypto assets. This week, on August 12, daily perpetual futures open interest closed at $17.98 million, an all time high for a product that wasn’t around even three months ago.
Open interest was under $5 million through the first week of June with two spikes toward $13 and $14 million mid month, then fell back into a $6 million to $7 million range where it remained for the rest of June. The next month, more specifically the second week of July, was when the floor moved with daily bars closing above $10 million and the last three weeks held between $12 million and $14 million.
The Floor Rising Matters More Than the Record
A single high print on a new platform usually indicates a couple of large positions that could’ve unwound within days. However, that is not what the chart shows. The bottom of the range keeps rising, which means traders are carrying risk on a platform that ten weeks ago listed nothing but short-dated binary event contracts.
The demand is certainly there for Kalshi perps and another telling sign of this is through volume. Kalshi’s perps crossed $1 billion in notional within a week of launch. Now in comparison to the platform’s event contracts, the business it built its name on, this took 40 months to hit that number.
$17.98 million next to $11.7 billion
Despite Kalshi’s Perps doing impressive numbers since launch, it’s still important to put it into some sort of perspective. Hyperliquid’s 24-hour open interest sits at $11.7 billion, per DefiLlama, on $7.17 billion of daily volume. Kalshi’s entire perp book is running at roughly 0.15% of that. Individual whales on Hyperliquid carry positions larger than everything Kalshi has open across all its crypto markets combined.
The gap is not just in size. CoinGecko states that Hyperliquid lists 377 perpetual pairs. Its HIP-3 segment, which covers non-crypto markets deployed by a single builder, sits above $4 billion in open interest on its own. That is one sleeve of one deployer’s markets, and it is more than 200 times Kalshi’s total.
Every New Market on Kalshi Starts with a Filing
Kalshi’s roster is small for a structural reason. Every contract it lists has to pass a federal regulator before a single trade prints. Hyperliquid deploys markets permissionlessly, which is why it can carry 377 pairs and add more whenever a deployer wants one.
That is also the honest read on the $17.98 million. The number is not small because demand is thin. It is small because there is almost nothing to trade and what exists took months of regulatory work to get listed. Concentrating that much open interest across so few contracts is a different signal than spreading it across hundreds.
The comparison people keep reaching for is the wrong one anyway. Kalshi is not taking flow from Hyperliquid. It is taking flow from US traders who previously had no compliant venue for leveraged crypto exposure at all and who were either offshore, on a VPN, or sitting out. That pool is separate, and nobody knows how deep it goes.
What breaks the trend is a stretch of flat or falling prints through late August. So far the chart has not given one.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

