Hyperliquid has burned $1.3 billion of HYPE by routing 99% of its fees into buybacks
In an August 12 memo, Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at asset manager Bitwise, said most crypto tokens other than Bitcoin are undervalued.
Investors are not aware of how much revenue protocols now pay back to holders. The clearest example is Hyperliquid retiring $1.3 billion of its HYPE token, he said. If the trend continues, the market “could see valuations double or more,” Hougan added.
Hougan says tokens now trade on revenue
For years, the main criticism of crypto was that networks could scale significantly, yet tokens captured little value.
Hougan said, “That era is over,” in the memo titled “Crypto’s Revenue Revolution.” He believes tokens are beginning to trade on the same yardstick as equities and bonds, which is revenue.
Hyperliquid generated over $800 million in revenue in the last year. The DEX sends about 99% of its fees to buy HYPE on the open market and burn it, according to the Bitwise memo.
Since the token went live in November 2024, those purchases take $1.3 billion of HYPE out of supply permanently.
Hougan said HYPE is up about 800% since launch, at a time when Bitcoin has lost about a third of its value. He credits part of the HYPE’s run to buyers predicting that rising volume would feed straight into the burn.
HYPE changed hands at $57.77, up 2.8% over seven days and 11.1% over the past 30 days, according to CoinGecko data.
Uniswap and Aave copy Hyperliquid’s model
Uniswap’s December 2025 vote on “UNIfication” switched on protocol fees for the first time, instantly burning 100 million UNI, or about $590 million. It now generates about $100 million a year, and it spends all of that on buybacks.
Aave plans to burn about $30 million of AAVE per year, close to a fifth of its revenue. It has implemented an automated program called Aavenomics 3.0.
Pump.fun, doing $328 million in annual revenue, had burned $370 million of PUMP by April 2026. Lighter, a newer perpetuals venue, bought back about 6% of its LIT supply on $67 million of revenue.
“Revenue fever” has reached base-layer chains, Hougan said. Solana’s community has proposed SGP-0003 to increase its fee burn up to 14 times.
Aptos hiked gas fees tenfold this year. Activity on Aptos almost tripled, and annual token burns soared from ~90,000 to about 1.9 million.
A January Cryptopolitan report found that shrinking supply has not reliably lifted prices and that many tokens with regular buybacks still underperformed the market and failed to hold a floor.
Even Hyperliquid broke its initial “up only” pattern. Pump.fun, at one point, had repurchased more than 18% of its supply while the token sat near its lows.
Hougan stated that a token buyback is not like a stock buyback since there’s no contractual right to profits or assets. Governance can always rewrite or change the economics.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

