Forecasts for $1M Bitcoin price deemed too ambitious
The $1M Bitcoin thesis has graduated from fringe Twitter speculation to boardroom presentation material. ARK Invest, Bernstein, VanEck, and MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor have all attached their names to seven-figure targets, with timelines ranging from 2028 to 2033.
What the bull case actually requires
Bitcoin currently trades near $64,000. Getting to $1 million means roughly 15 to 16 times growth from here. The most coherent version of the bull case runs through the global store-of-value market, which analysts estimate at around $121 trillion. Bitcoin currently holds approximately 4% of that market, a share dominated by gold. To justify a $1 million price tag, Bitcoin would need to capture something closer to 17% of that addressable market, a more than fourfold increase in relative share.
ARK Invest’s high-end scenario puts Bitcoin at $1.5 million by 2030. Bernstein takes a more measured line, projecting a near-term target of $150,000 while keeping $1 million as a long-term directional goal rather than a hard forecast.
Where the skeptics push back
The stock-to-flow model, popularized by the pseudonymous analyst PlanB, has historically pointed toward $500,000 to $1 million per Bitcoin in a given cycle. The model draws an analogy to precious metals: assets that are hard to produce tend to hold value well, and Bitcoin’s halving mechanism makes new supply progressively scarcer over time.
Some cycle-based analysts have converged on a more conservative range: a peak somewhere between $300,000 and $500,000 by 2029, driven by the continued ripple effects of the April 2024 halving.
Bitcoin has dropped more than 80% from peak to trough in prior bear markets.
Institutional conviction, tempered arithmetic
MicroStrategy remains the most visible corporate believer. The company has continued adding to its Bitcoin treasury, holding hundreds of thousands of BTC on its balance sheet as a core strategic position. Saylor’s public price targets have landed as high as $13 million per Bitcoin over a multi-decade horizon.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in the US market, bringing in billions in inflows from investors who previously had no clean on-ramp. Bernstein’s $150,000 near-term target implies substantial upside from current levels without requiring historic market share shifts.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

