One stock wrote the Dow Jones Industrial Average's entire session
The Dow Jones Industrial Average trades near 53,700 on Thursday, roughly 75 points and a tenth of a percent lower, on a morning when the S&P 500 prints a fresh record intraday high and the Nasdaq Composite runs close to a percent higher. The obvious reading of that gap is an old-economy benchmark missing a technology rally on a soft inflation print, and it is the wrong one.
The arithmetic runs through a single component that reported its fiscal fourth quarter after Wednesday's session and is being marked down for it. That one reaction accounts for very nearly the whole decline, and what separates this index from the other two averages on Thursday is not the businesses it owns but the method by which it counts them.
One name, most of the move
Cisco (CSCO) trades roughly 9% lower after quarterly results the market read as a disappointment on margins rather than on revenue. The shares carried a price near $124 into the report, so a fall of that size strips close to $11 of share price out of the average. The index is price weighted, converting share-price Dollars into index points at roughly six points per Dollar across the thirty members.
One name therefore delivers something near 65 index points of a decline that runs to 75, which leaves the other twenty-nine roughly where the rest of the market is. Cerebras (CBRS) dropped 13% on its own results and cost the average nothing, because it is not a member, and neither are Meta Platforms (META), Micron (MU) or Netflix (NFLX), the three names doing most of the work in the Nasdaq Composite.
The curve stopped pricing a path
Futures put the odds of at least one increase by December 9 at 68.3%, against a December hike that was fully priced on Monday. September 16 carries 34.4%, down from close to a coin flip, and October 28 sits at 48.9% having been better than three in four. Three sessions and two inflation prints have produced the largest dovish repricing of the year.
The distribution underneath those numbers did not follow them down. The odds of two increases by December stand at 23.3% against 24.1% on Monday, effectively unmoved, while the probability of a cut is exactly zero at every 2026 meeting and does not clear one percentage point until the second half of 2027. This is a market pricing a fork rather than a path: the Strait reopens and there is no increase at all, or it stays shut and there are two.
A hawk spoke, then the print landed
A voting regional Fed president took a podium at 12:15 GMT to argue that the central bank should raise rates now rather than wait, scoring 8.2 against a 7.3 average for the speaker on the calendar's hawkish scale. Fifteen minutes later the July Producer Price Index (PPI) landed unchanged on the month against a 0.2% consensus, with core PPI at 0.2% against 0.3%. The second speaker of the morning, at 12:40 GMT, does not hold a vote this year.
The disinflation inside that release is a barrel rather than a policy, which is the part a rates market repricing off it has to own. Headline producer prices at 4.7% YoY and core at 4.2% sit nowhere near any target, and the sequential cooling tracks Crude Oil handing back its war premium, with Brent roughly 2% lower near $87.00 and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) just above $81.00 against prints above $100.00 last month.
Friday's data
Retail sales for July arrive at 12:30 GMT on Friday, the headline expected at 0.1% against 0.2% previously, sales excluding autos at 0.2% against -0.2%, and a control group whose prior reading was 0.5%. Preliminary University of Michigan sentiment for August follows at 14:00 GMT with a 54.5 consensus from 55.2, one-year inflation expectations last at 4.2% and the five-year at 3.3%.
The inflation-expectation components matter more here than the sentiment headline, because a survey that softens while both horizons hold still gives the front end nothing it can trade. Initial jobless claims at 209K against a 202K consensus already argued on Thursday that the labour side is loosening, which is the half of the mandate this committee has spent the year declining to price.
Levels
Resistance: Just above 54,000, where Thursday's high stalled within points of Monday's ceiling, and above that the record just short of 54,750.
Support: The 53,600 area, Thursday's low and the first print beneath the 53,800 floor that pinned the index through the week, then 53,500 and 53,250, with the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) near 52,300 far below.
Bias: Bearish while just above 54,000 caps. Three lower highs since the August 5 record, a floor near 53,800 given up, and a daily Stochastic Relative Strength Index (Stoch RSI) in the mid-70s that has climbed back through its upper half without buying any price progress leave the near-term path lower. Objectives 53,500 then 53,250, invalidation on a daily close above 54,100 reopening the record.
Dow Jones daily chart
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

