Investors Bet on Valuation Doubling! Report: Anthropic Plans to Go Public at $2 Trillion Valuation, Potentially the Largest IPO in History
According to media reports, six shareholders have revealed that Anthropic's rapidly growing revenue will support more than doubling its current valuation in its planned autumn IPO, with annualized revenue expected to reach $100-120 billion by the end of 2026.
Anthropic is moving toward an unprecedented market milestone. Multiple investors expect that this AI startup will go public this fall with a valuation of $2 trillion or higher, surpassing SpaceX to become the largest IPO in history.
According to the Financial Times, six Anthropic shareholders told the media that the company's rapidly growing revenue will support a more than doubling of its existing valuation in the planned fall listing.
Investors expect that by the end of 2026, the annualized revenue of this Claude model maker will reach $100-120 billion, more than a tenfold increase from early 2026. If this expectation is realized, early investors in this five-year-old company would see billions of dollars in paper profits.
However, this record-setting IPO plan faces significant uncertainties: pressure from competitors is continuing to rise, and Anthropic’s relationship with the U.S. government remains tense.
According to two informed investors, export controls by the Department of Commerce on Anthropic's flagship models led to a slowdown in the company’s overall revenue growth in June. Public market sentiment toward the AI boom is also becoming more cautious, and whether the final pricing can support this valuation remains unknown.
The Logic Behind the $2 Trillion Valuation: High Revenue Growth as Core Support
The core reason Anthropic investors are betting on such a high valuation is the company’s extraordinary revenue growth.
Investors expect Anthropic’s annualized revenue to increase more than tenfold in 2026, reaching $100–120 billion. The company prefers to use annualized measurements—that is, extrapolating the recent performance to a full-year sales estimate.
“If Anthropic’s annual growth rate reaches 800%, you would think at a very low valuation multiple, they should be priced at least 30 times revenue,” one investor said. “That means a $3 trillion company.”
Currently, AI-beneficiary publicly listed companies—such as data intelligence company Palantir and cloud service provider Nebius—are trading at about 55 times sales this year. While there are no directly comparable U.S.-listed peers for Anthropic, investors have built their own financial models based on these, resulting in even higher valuation ranges.
In May, Anthropic announced its annualized revenue surpassed $47 billion and submitted its IPO filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in June. It is currently in a quiet period, with public disclosures on financial performance restricted.
Surpassing OpenAI, but Tensions with the U.S. Government Remain
Anthropic has made significant progress in the competitive landscape this year. The company continues to lead in model performance, has launched a series of models surpassing competitors, and is focusing its business on enterprise client sales.
Venture capital firms, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors have injected nearly $100 billion into the company by 2026. In May, Anthropic’s valuation surpassed OpenAI for the first time, reaching $965 billion after accounting for the latest financing round.
Data from payment data company Ramp shows that Anthropic gained market share among U.S. enterprise clients last month.
However, challenges are also mounting. Anthropic has clashed several times with the Trump administration and remains embroiled in litigation with the U.S. Department of Defense—which listed Anthropic as a supply chain risk earlier this year.
In June, the Department of Commerce imposed export controls on Anthropic, forcing the temporary removal of its flagship models Fable 5 and Mythos 5—a move that unsettled customers relying on its products.
Cost Pressures and Competition Impact Pricing Range
Pricing is another major pressure point for Anthropic’s business model.
According to AI model analytics firm Artificial Analysis, the usage cost of Anthropic’s market-leading models is more than double that of OpenAI’s flagship models, while this year’s significantly improved open-source models cost only a fraction of that.
Enterprise clients have become increasingly sensitive to the cost of using the best models. Ramp analysts note that companies are “hitting AI spending caps” and turning to cheaper alternatives. Some businesses have even withdrawn previous orders for employees to maximize AI usage.
In response, an Anthropic investor who also holds shares in OpenAI and SpaceX said: “Of course it’s easy to list the challenges, but the company remains number one in performance, market position and the exposure users are seeking.” SpaceX went public at a valuation of $1.77 trillion in June this year.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

