Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Bitcoin ETF Outflows, Ethereum Inflows: Are Indian Traders Missing a BTC-to-ETH Rotation?

Bitcoin ETF Outflows, Ethereum Inflows: Are Indian Traders Missing a BTC-to-ETH Rotation?

CoineditionCoinedition2026/08/13 10:30
By:Coinedition

Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have started exhibiting a diverging trend recently. While Bitcoin ETFs see marginal outflows, Ethereum funds are attracting fresh money, according to the latest reports. This shift has raised a significant question about the investors’ changing sentiment. The market remains divided over whether institutions have begun shifting their focus from Bitcoin to Ethereum.

This picture is important for Indian traders, who tend to prioritize Bitcoin over Ethereum. If ETH continues to attract global institutional interest and outperform BTC, the trend could eventually be mirrored in India as well.

The latest crypto ETF data highlights a clear difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum. Reportedly, Bitcoin ETFs saw net outflows, with Fidelity’s FBTC recording the largest withdrawal at $46.8 million. But reducing this larger negative effect, BlackRock’s IBIT recorded $14.3 million in inflows.

At the same time, Ethereum ETFs moved in the opposite direction. They marked about $7.38 million in net flows, with BlackRock’s ETHA leading the inflows. This indicates that ETH has started attracting institutional funds, overpowering BTC.

Despite this shift, the numbers are still too small. Thus, the shift cannot be considered a major repositioning among institutions as of now. As Bitcoin ETFs have exhibited a remarkable performance since their launch in January 2024, with assets under management at $79 billion, the latest trend cannot undermine the broader institutional demand for them. But if both funds continue to show these contrasting trends in the upcoming weeks, it could provide more clues on whether institutions are actually rotating from BTC to ETH.

Notably, the ETF flows alone cannot determine institutions’ broader preference. These cryptocurrencies’ price performance is a major factor to consider. The BTC and ETH prices over the past few weeks could give a stronger hint on changing investor sentiment.

Recently, ETH has been showing slight signs of strength against Bitcoin. This makes the ETH/BTC ratio an important metric to watch. While BTC is valued at $63,611, with a 1.10% weekly decline, ETH is trading at $1,886, down 0.9%. The current ETH/BTC ratio is 0.0296, meaning 1 ETH is worth about 0.0296 BTC.

ETH/BTC Chart

The market’s trading volume is also another factor to consider. Currently, Bitcoin’s 24-hour trading volume is at around $22.2 billion; Ethereum registered roughly $7 billion. This indicates that BTC’s trading activity is more than three times higher than that of ETH. Thus, a temporary change in the ETF flows cannot completely determine the demand for BTC or ETH.

If ETH continues to outperform BTC in institutional interest, it could strengthen speculation of a broader rotation. But if the current sentiment around ETH fades and BTC regains momentum, it could provide support for the pioneer cryptocurrency.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It is worth noting that the current difference in the global institutional interest in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs does not actually define the Indian crypto trading activity. It doesn’t necessarily mean that Indians are also moving away from BTC.

As of now, Bitcoin remains the most preferred digital asset in India. Although Ethereum is also being traded in India, BTC takes priority. As of now, the BTC/INR value is ₹ 60,71,204, and the ETH/INR value is ₹ 1,79,291.

If the ETH/INR volume rises while BTC/INR activity weakens, it may suggest that Indian traders are also following the global trend. However, as of now, Indian traders continue to opt for Bitcoin over Ethereum.

div#ce-iframe-ads div#frame { margin: auto; text-align: center; }
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027