Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Solana outage knocks 90 validators offline – Was the network at risk?

Solana outage knocks 90 validators offline – Was the network at risk?

AMBCryptoAMBCrypto2026/08/13 08:00
By:AMBCrypto

Solana’s [SOL] latest disruption exposed how quickly infrastructure issues can spread across validators sharing common dependencies. A routing failure pushed 28.83% of staked SOL offline, affecting roughly 90 validators for about 33 minutes.

This left only 4.51 percentage points, or roughly 19.9 million SOL, before hitting the crucial 33.34% finality threshold. Despite this setback, transactions continued finalizing, showing consensus remained functional despite losing nearly a third of participating stakes.

As routing recovered, delinquent stakes gradually fell toward zero, preventing broader disruption for users. However, validators lost around 333 SOL in rewards, creating a direct economic cost from the outage.

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^="bsa-zone_1774359638628-7_123456"] { min-height: 50px; transition: min-height 0.3s ease; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 640px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^="bsa-zone_1774359638628-7_123456"] { min-height: 90px; } }
AD

More importantly, the near-halt exposed correlated infrastructure risk, making validator hosting diversity and automatic failover critical safeguards against another routing failure.

Solana stays above the 33.34% finality threshold

That infrastructure weakness ultimately tested whether Solana could retain enough voting power to keep confirming transactions. Despite 28.83% of the stake going offline, another 71.17% remained active, keeping participation above the two-thirds requirement.

As such, transaction finalization did occur, which prevented a user from experiencing a delay on their pending transactions. In addition, the Solana network had just narrowly avoided being unable to provide that level of finalization.Therefore, the probability of a second correlated outage occurring simultaneously increased significantly.

As validators recovered, voting participation improved, and the immediate threat faded without disrupting block production. Still, maintaining finality under pressure does not remove the underlying risk.

Another correlated outage affecting additional stakes could cross the 33.34% threshold, turning infrastructure disruption into a network-wide halt.

Validator diversity contains routing failure

The ability to survive this outage was in part due to validation services outside the impacted routing group continuing to function as normal while connections were restored in all areas.

Even though AS20326 had more than 25% of the total SOL staking pool online at the time of the outage. This accounted for approximately 94% of their stake failing.

Nonetheless, since validators were distributed across many providers and geographies, they maintained connectivity, preventing the failure from cascading. In total, there were 699 validators with stakes on Solana at the time of the outage.

However, as a direct result of the failure, 597, or 85% of them, continued to vote for blocks.

Recovery then strengthened this buffer, as affected validators gradually rejoined within roughly 40 minutes. This restored voting participation before another infrastructure failure could compound the disruption.

Therefore, geographic and provider diversity limited the outage, while rapid recovery prevented concentrated infrastructure exposure from becoming systemic.

Final Summary

  • Solana kept finalizing transactions despite 28.83% of staked SOL going offline during the routing failure.
  • Validator diversity and rapid recovery prevented the outage from crossing the 33.34% threshold and halting finality.
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027