Bitcoin (BTC) has fallen into its cost of production zone, a level that has historically marked the bottom during previous bear markets. The largest cryptocurrency is currently trading between $63,000 and $64,000, a range it has maintained for several days.
Bitcoin trades at cost of production zone, drops nearly 50% from 2025 peak
Market performance and investor sentiment
BTC has now declined almost 50% from its 2025 all-time high, raising concerns among some investors regarding its near-term trajectory. As the price approaches breakeven levels for many miners, market participants are watching for signs that a new bottom may have formed.
Bitcoin has dropped down to its cost of production zone, a level historically associated with bear-market bottoms.
Bitcoin’s cost of production refers to the estimated minimum price required for miners to remain profitable, factoring in electricity and equipment expenses. This zone often acts as a psychological and technical floor during extended price corrections.
Mini dictionary: Cost of production zone, the approximate price level at which Bitcoin mining becomes unprofitable for most miners, often referenced as a potential support level during bear markets.
Factors influencing Bitcoin’s potential recovery
Several factors could shape BTC’s price movement in the coming months. Industry analysts point first to a liquidity drain in the cryptocurrency market earlier this year, which coincided with increased capital flows into the stock market, particularly shares of artificial intelligence (AI) companies. AI-related memory chips saw strong growth, but experts indicate this cycle may have reached its peak, which could trigger a reversal and renewed interest in digital assets.
In addition, easing inflation rates over the past months have raised the possibility that the US Federal Reserve could lower interest rates. Rate cuts typically encourage risk-taking among investors, potentially boosting demand for volatile assets like BTC.
Geopolitical dynamics may also impact sentiment. The ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran is reportedly approaching resolution, as President Trump has stated an intention to finalize a peace agreement that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Stabilized oil prices and improved geopolitical stability could bolster investor confidence in global markets, including cryptocurrencies.
Bitcoin’s historical performance and cyclical trends
BTC historically displays a four-year cycle, according to multiple analysts. The coin reached successive all-time highs in 2017, 2021, and most recently in 2025. Many anticipate this rhythm could continue, projecting a potential new peak in 2029. However, several experts caution that any sustained rally may not begin until closer to 2027, depending on a range of macroeconomic and geopolitical developments.
Market observers remain divided on the immediate outlook, but several are closely monitoring signs that could indicate a turnaround, such as renewed inflows, improved risk appetite, and resolution of major international tensions.
| 2017 | $19,700 | ~84% |
| 2021 | $69,000 | ~75% |
| 2025 | $127,000* | ~50% |
*2025 ATH is an illustrative placeholder; actual peak data may vary by source.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

