"White-haired Stock God" Serenity responds to criticism: The market is the ultimate judge of right and wrong, not angry comments on social media platforms.

Odaily reported that "White-Haired Stock God" Serenity posted on X reflecting on past experiences of having multiple investment viewpoints questioned. He stated that many original investment ideas are often strongly opposed at first, but ultimately the market becomes the standard to judge right or wrong. He mentioned that he had been heavily criticized for being bullish on several companies, for example:

$AXTI: Initially criticized as a "scam company" and even banned from Reddit’s WSB forum due to related discussions; however, subsequent coverage from Reuters, performance of its indium phosphide substrate (InP substrate) business, and institutional investors validated his logic.

$RPI: Originally labeled as a "meme stock" by the market, with analysts claiming it lacked fundamentals, but financial reports projected future revenue growth of 58%, and it was revalued as a high-growth AI hardware company.

$SIVE: Once considered a "meme stock" by many investors, later received institutional buying support and attention from companies such as Fidelity Research and JPMorgan Chase, and announced partnerships with Jabil, GlobalFoundries, and others.

Serenity stated, "Ultimately, the market decides what is right or wrong, not angry comments or posts on X (formerly Twitter)." He noted that as each investment thesis is validated, market performance will eventually drown out early noise. He also listed several other cases that were once questioned but were later recognized by the market, including:

$AAOI: Criticized around $30 for "untrustworthy management";

$LITE: Deemed to be in a photonics bubble at $300;

$RKLB: Viewed as just a low-revenue launch company at $20;

$HOOD: Faced negative sentiment around $20 due to the GameStop trading restriction incident;

$IQE: Considered just a small UK company lacking partnerships in the photonics sector;

$SOI: European banking analysts thought it was overvalued;

$NBIS: Questioned for lacking competitive barriers;

$INTC: The market believed it could not compete with TSMC;

$MRVL: Concerns that Broadcom would seize its ASIC market share;

$AEHR: Market misread financial reports, believed the company lacked revenue;

$EWY: The market thought there was a bubble in Korea’s semiconductor cycle.