Three Decisive Laws At Stake During The "Crypto Week" In Washington
Crypto is at a crossroads. Under the cold neon lights of the Capitol, the fate of a digital world is being decided with ink and calculations. Starting July 14, Washington begins its “Crypto Week”: a decisive parliamentary session where three major bills will be debated. Three texts, three possible directions for the future of digital assets in the United States.
In Brief
- The US Congress is reviewing three key crypto bills, including the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS framework for stablecoins.
- Opposition is growing against the issuance of a digital dollar (CBDC), deemed too intrusive.
- These texts could transform crypto regulation in the US, but their adoption remains uncertain.
The Moment of Choice
In Washington, silence is never neutral. And this week, it hangs on three bills. What insiders already call “Crypto Week” is not just another parliamentary session. It’s a tipping point. Three projects. Three possibilities that, if passed, will reshape the face of American digital finance.
At the center of the storm is the CLARITY Act. Behind the elegant acronym is an attempt to rewrite the rules of the game. The Howey test, that relic from the 1930s, is out. In comes recognition of “mature” blockchains, delegation of authority to the CFTC, and a vision that treats cryptos as commodities rather than securities. This semantic shift, almost poetic, could yet break down the regulatory barriers.
But in the shadows of the debates, concerns rumble. Elizabeth Warren sounds the alarm , warning of a haven for tech giants and a nightmare for transparency.
Critics keep coming forward, denouncing a legislative rush fueled by the deep pockets of crypto’s Silicon Valley. Yet, momentum is there. Fueled by open letters, signatures from entrepreneurs, Stand With Crypto campaigns… as if history wants to be written in fast-forward.
The Stablecoin in Majesty: The GENIUS Act and the Ambition of a New Dollar
Less conspicuous, but perhaps more decisive: the GENIUS project . Behind this messianic-sounding name is a firm will: to make stablecoins no longer an experiment but a standard. The text frames, marks, and limits. It imposes reserves, demands transparency, and tries to make stability a cardinal value.
The Senate, in a rare bipartisan effort, has already paved the way. The dollar envisions a future strengthened by blockchain , backed by regulatory prudence. At its core, the stablecoin is a pragmatic utopia. Neither anarchist flight nor surveillance tool. A middle ground. A breach where the financial system can evolve without exploding.
But nothing is simple. Behind the guarantees, doubts remain: what are the consequences for the bond market? For the Treasury’s influence? And above all, for the role of central banks in this uncertain balance? The GENIUS Act aims to outline a new economic pact. It must first convince that it does not fracture the old one.
No to the Digital Dollar? Fierce Opposition to the CBDC
The third piece of the triptych: the anti-CBDC bill. From the pen of Republican Tom Emmer, a principled opposition to a digital dollar issued by the Fed. For its defenders, the CBDC is nothing but a dystopian state surveillance avatar. For its opponents, the absence of a CBDC means leaving the field open to China, the digital yuan, and ambitions of global monetary domination.
This text, more ideological than technical, reflects America’s deep fractures regarding crypto. Between fear of control and fear of falling behind, tensions rise. Congress hesitates: should it run with innovation or keep it on a leash? The answer is not binary: it is political.
In the background, the idea that everything is at stake now. That legislation must happen before the market self-institutes. Before financial metaverses fully emancipate from Washington. Crypto, this unruly child of decentralization, knocks on the Capitol’s door. Demanding to be recognized or at least contained.
Uncertain Epilogue: A Breath in the Halls
In this overheated summer week, three laws move forward with quiet but determined steps. Nothing is decided. And perhaps nothing will be settled. But already, the mere fact they are being debated shows that crypto is no longer a mirage nor a threat. It is a matter to legislate on, a fait accompli.
While some see this legislation as a Faustian pact between politics and venture capital, others perceive the stirrings of a new order. An order where blockchain no longer just challenges the system, but becomes one of its cornerstones.
Congress may decide, perhaps. But crypto does not ask for permission to move forward. Whether one tries to contain it or crown it, it slips between the lines, elusive, continuing its path made of bursts and jolts.
Between the old order and source code, a new world is emerging, tentatively but with irresistible force. Because while legislators debate behind closed doors, bitcoin is already approaching $118,000, Ethereum passes $3,000 . The market spoke before the law. The promise is underway. And it no longer is just stated: it is embodied.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

