Senate confirms former blockchain executive Jonathan Gould to lead OCC
Quick Take Jonathan Gould was previously chief legal officer at Bitfury and, before that, was senior deputy comptroller and chief counsel at the OCC. Earlier in the day, during a procedural vote for Gould’s nomination, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, who is very pro-crypto, voted against his nomination, according to reporting from Punchbowl News.
The U.S. Senate voted to confirm former blockchain executive Jonathan Gould to lead the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, sending the nomination to President Donald Trump for final approval.
The Senate voted 50 to 45 on Thursday.
Gould was previously the chief legal officer at Bitfury and, before that, served as senior deputy comptroller and chief counsel at the OCC, which regulates and supervises national banks and federal savings associations. Trump tapped Gould to lead that agency in February .
Earlier in the day, during a procedural vote for Gould's nomination, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, a staunch crypto advocate, voted against his nomination, according to reporting from Punchbowl News' Brendan Pedersen. A Lummis spokesperson said that the senator needed to have further discussions with Gould regarding stablecoin legislation and the "federal preemption of state banking laws," Pedersen reported.
During the afternoon vote, Lummis ultimately voted yes to confirm.
Lawmakers are quickly moving ahead with stablecoin legislation, with next week designated as "Crypto Week" to consider the GENIUS Act in the House. The bill requires stablecoins to be fully backed by U.S. dollars or similarly liquid assets, mandates annual audits for issuers with a market capitalization exceeding $50 billion, and establishes guidelines for foreign issuance.
The OCC has already made a few more crypto-friendly moves this year, including clarifying that U.S banks can buy and sell crypto assets on their behalf. The agency also said it was removing references to reputation risk from its handbooks and guidance, though it noted that it would not change its expectation on how banks handle risks.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

