China's creditors react to FTX's proposed payments block
- Creditors challenge FTX motion in US court
- Cryptocurrencies are considered personal property in China.
- FTX proposal affects payments in 49 countries
A group of creditors, led by Weiwei Ji, has filed a legal challenge to the FTX estate's motion to suspend payments to residents of countries with legal restrictions on cryptocurrency transactions. According to a document filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware, Ji claims to represent more than 300 Chinese creditors, despite currently residing in Singapore. His Chinese passport was the criterion used to classify him as a Chinese creditor.
In his objection, Ji argues that payments made by FTX are denominated in US dollars, a widely accepted currency that is beyond the scope of local prohibitions on digital assets. He also points out that in China, cryptocurrencies are considered a form of personal property, which legitimizes the distribution of value.
"My family has four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million... We have fully complied with all procedural requirements of the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and unfair manner," Ji stated in the filing.
The proposal filed by FTX Estate was filed on July 2 and highlights legal risks associated with making payments in jurisdictions with restrictive cryptocurrency laws. The company cited 49 countries, including China, Russia, Ukraine, Egypt, Tunisia, Zimbabwe, Afghanistan, and Moldova, where local regulations could expose executives and legal representatives to civil and even criminal penalties.
As an example, the FTX estate mentioned Moldova, where it is a crime to provide services involving virtual assets, even if in an auxiliary manner to another activity.
Since February 18, FTX Estate has begun refunding creditors classified as "convenience class," based on the price of digital assets in November 2022, the time of the exchange's collapse. This policy has sparked discontent among several creditors, especially those affected by the proposed new restrictions.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

