US senators seek sanctions on El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele over Bitcoin misuse and human rights violations
A group of US Democratic senators has introduced a new bill to sanction El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele and members of his administration.
The legislation, titled the El Salvador Accountability Act (S.2058), was put forward by Senators Chris Van Hollen, Tim Kaine, and Alex Padilla.
If passed, the bill would require President Donald Trump to impose sanctions over alleged human rights violations and the misuse of Bitcoin by the Salvadoran government.
Bill details
The proposed legislation accuses El Salvador’s government of violating internationally recognized human rights, particularly through the country’s ongoing state of exception.
Due to this, it calls for sanctions on President Bukele, members of his cabinet, and other individuals working on behalf of the government—including political party officials and leaders of government institutions—based on credible information of misconduct.
The bill proposes strong penalties, including freezing US-held assets, visa denials, and suspending financial aid.
The lawmakers argue that Salvadoran institutions have committed these violations while benefiting from US taxpayer dollars.
The bill also requires the president to provide annual updates, beginning with a detailed report on sanctioned individuals within 90 days of its passage.
Meanwhile, the legislation also directs the US Secretary of State to submit a comprehensive report about El Salvador’s crypto use within 90 days of the bill’s enactment.
This report must outline how Salvadoran officials have allegedly used Bitcoin and other digital assets to engage in corruption, evade sanctions, and misuse government resources.
It should include an estimate of how much public funding El Salvador has spent on Bitcoin acquisitions, identify the exchanges used for those purchases, list associated wallet addresses, and highlight any actors with access to the funds.
Additionally, the report must evaluate potential loopholes in El Salvador’s crypto strategy that could be exploited for illicit purposes, including efforts to bypass international financial sanctions.
Bukele’s response
In response to the bill, President Bukele dismissed the US lawmakers’ attempt to impose sanctions on him and his government.
On June 8, Bukele mocked the proposal in a post on X (formerly Twitter), suggesting that the lawmakers’ efforts were fueled by frustration.
This reaction is not surprising, given the growing relationship between the two presidents. This includes their collaboration on El Salvador’s efforts to combat criminal gangs and their shared pro-crypto stance.
President Trump invited Bukele to the White House in April to discuss US immigration support. Two months later, Trump’s advisor, Bo Hines, met with Bukele to explore potential crypto partnerships.
The post US senators seek sanctions on El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele over Bitcoin misuse and human rights violations appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

