Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story

Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2025/07/09 10:30
By:Ananda Banerjee

Peanut (PNUT) jumped 12% after Elon Musk’s tweet, but on-chain signals flash caution. Exchange netflows and muted funding rates hint at retail-driven FOMO rather than real momentum. With resistance holding firm, PNUT needs stronger conviction to break out.

Peanut the Squirrel (PNUT) surged over 12% following a vague Elon Musk tweet that set crypto speculation on fire. 

While the tweet made no direct mention of the coin, degens and meme-hunters were quick to draw connections and buy in. But beneath the hype, on-chain indicators tell a very different story. From inflows and funding rate flips to Chaikin divergence, the real PNUT price move seems to have belonged to early folks, not retail.

Netflows Flipped After Tweet, But Retail Sold the Top

The first signs of movement came before Musk’s tweet, not after it.

On July 8, the exchange netflows flipped positive, with $1.54 million worth of PNUT moving onto exchanges, likely traders positioning for a sell.

That was hours before the price peaked.

Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story image 0

Four hours later, as PNUT hit $0.2398 (up from $0.2136), outflows spiked again, with nearly $920,000 in tokens withdrawn. The pattern is clear: early players moved in before the tweet, while retail likely bought the top and exited late.

Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story image 1PNUT price and netflow post-tweet:

Funding Rate Move Towards Zero for First Time in Weeks

For many days, the funding rate for PNUT stayed negative, showing that more traders were betting on the price to fall. But right after Musk’s tweet on July 8, that changed. The rate moved closer to zero, reaching -0.0074% on July 9.

That means some traders started opening long positions, expecting the price to rise. However, since the rate was still negative, it indicates they aren’t yet confident. They’re testing the trend, not jumping in fully. This shift hints at growing interest, but not a strong bullish signal.

Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story image 2PNUT price and funding rate pre-tweet:

Funding rates are fees paid between long and short traders. When funding is negative, short traders are dominant. A positive rate means long traders are in control.

Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story image 3PNUT price and funding rate post-tweet:

PNUT Price Faces Fib Resistance, With Invalidation in Sight

The Fibonacci retracement drawn from the previous swing low to high (July 3) shows PNUT price retested the 0.382 Fib level at $0.2386, after momentarily breaching it. That zone, along with $0.245 and $0.256, remains the critical resistance levels. PNUT Price is now back near $0.22 and struggling to reclaim the bullish trend.

Elon Musk’s Post Sparks PNUT Price Buzz, But On-Chain Data Tells a Different Story image 4PNUT price analysis:

If PNUT price manages to reclaim $0.245 cleanly, a move toward $0.256 is back on the table.

But a drop below $0.216 (key trendline and 0.786 Fib) would break the bullish structure, pushing PNUT lower than the long-holding ascending trendline. This would flip short-term bias bearish.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027