Scammers Use OP_RETURN to Lay Claim to Mt. Gox’s Lost 80,000 Bitcoin
Scammers are leveraging Bitcoin's OP_RETURN feature to target the 1Feex wallet with 80,000 BTC stolen from Mt. Gox, fueling concerns over phishing and legal exploitation.
A disturbing new scam is leveraging the obscure OP_RETURN feature in Bitcoin transactions to target one of the most infamous addresses in crypto history — the 1Feex wallet containing approximately 80,000 BTC stolen from Mt. Gox.
That stash is worth over $8.7 billion at current prices, making it a prime target for fraudsters attempting to claim legal rights over it.
How OP_RETURN Is Helping Scammers Target Mt. Gox’s Missing 80,000 Bitcoin
The Mt. Gox collapse in 2014 resulted in 850,000 BTC going missing. Although 140,000 BTC were recovered for creditor repayments, wallets like 1Feex have remained untouched until now.
Whoever is behind the scam is likely banking on two outcomes. The first is collecting sensitive user data by masquerading as the wallet’s custodian.
Second, they are laying the groundwork for a legal claim to ownership, perhaps similar to past lawsuits aimed at forcing Bitcoin developers to hand over access to lost coins.
Going by the latter, BitMEX Research has uncovered a scam. It involves sending small transactions to legacy Bitcoin addresses using the OP_RETURN field. This is a space in the Bitcoin blockchain meant to store arbitrary data.
One such transaction to the dormant 1Feex address contains a message directing viewers to a suspicious website.
“NOTICE TO OWNER: see www.salomon[]bros.[]com/owner_notice,” BitMEX Research revealed.
The linked website represents a client who has taken “constructive possession” of the wallet and is seeking to identify a “bona fide owner.”
Transactions with an OP_Return output. Source:
BitMEX Research on X
It reportedly claims affiliation with the historic Wall Street firm Salomon Brothers. However, BitMEX researchers state that the links are fake.
“Do NOT fill in this form,” the team warned.
BitMEX Research team also pointed out that the site seeks personal identification data under pretenses. The scam attempts to cloak itself in legal legitimacy.
scam? or hack, with legal cover?
— matthew sigel, recovering CFA (@matthew_sigel) July 8, 2025
Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Assets Research at VanEck, reflects broader concerns in the crypto community, especially regarding the scam’s legal framing.
Why Calvin Ayre’s Legal History Resurfaces in OP_RETURN Ownership Controversy
Users immediately mentioned Calvin Ayre, a longtime Bitcoin SV proponent and controversial figure. Ayre has reportedly funded legal actions asserting ownership over dormant or stolen Bitcoin.
Calvin funded a case where ownership of this exact address was claimed. Legal action was taken against the Bitcoin developers over it
— BitMEX Research (@BitMEXResearch) July 8, 2025
However, some users took this insight with a pinch of salt, cautioning against slander. More closely, one user asked for proof that Ayre has run phishing-style scams.
I’m not following. So there is a shady website listed in the op return that could collect personal information?Why would somebody who moves 80k coins participate in such a scam? There is a short list of people this could be?
— Bryan (@Bryan10309) July 8, 2025
Notwithstanding, the fact remains that OP_RETURN is now being weaponized in a gray zone between spam and pseudo-legal attacks.
Meanwhile, this scam arrives amid renewed controversy over OP_RETURN limits in Bitcoin Core. BeInCrypto reported on a proposal to restrict OP_RETURN data to 80 bytes under Bitcoin Core v0.30. The report cites network bloat and spam concerns.
While the limit remains under review, the new wave of scams may give fresh weight to the argument for tighter controls.
“OP_RETURN outputs greater than 83 bytes will increase significantly, UTXO bloat will keep getting worse and there will be more garbage on chain. This is going to age like a bad tattoo,” self-proclaimed Bitcoin expert Jimmy Song said at the time.
Further, in late April, BeInCrypto reported a rift among Bitcoin Core developers triggered by Peter Todd’s proposal to restrict OP_RETURN even further.
Critics argued that it would stifle innovation and off-chain use cases. Meanwhile, others supported it to reduce attack surfaces and abuse.
Also, Bitcoin should not follow an "L2 centric" roadmap. It's actually what killed Ethereum. Bitcoin is money and should be focused on that.
— Alishiya
(@alipaints) April 29, 2025
However, as this new exploit demonstrates, OP_RETURN is now being twisted for phishing schemes. Bad actors prey on legal uncertainty and dormant assets.
In this case, billions are at stake as the line between technical freedom and exploitable vectors is again under scrutiny. The interest comes as OP_RETURN transactions anchor these messages immutably into Bitcoin’s ledger.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.
Crypto prices
More
