Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Trump’s tariff wall threatens Southeast Asia’s supply chains

Trump’s tariff wall threatens Southeast Asia’s supply chains

CryptopolitanCryptopolitan2025/07/09 11:20
By:By Nellius Irene

Share link:In this post: Trump plans to introduce new 25–40% tariffs on Southeast Asian countries to target Chinese goods. Experts warn that the Trump tariffs could disrupt supply chains and raise prices in the US. The new rules may cause inflation and confuse businesses due to uneven enforcement.

Trade tensions rise as US President Donald Trump threatens new tariffs on Southeast Asian countries.

Analysts have warned that this could erect a “tariff wall” that disrupts regional supply chains and raises prices for American consumers.

Trump’s new threats come as an August 1st deadline for trade deals approaches. He said he planned to impose new tariffs , from 25% to 40%, on countries including Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, and Thailand. These countries have become primary port calls for a shuffle of Chinese goods redirected to skirt current US tariffs.

Vietnam, the largest in this chain of trans-shipping, receives a 20% tariff on the goods it exports to the US and gets hit with 40% on the re-routed goods. Trump says the tariffs will generate more than $300 billion by the end of the year, beginning with what he called “big money” starting to come in from August.

Tariffs reshape global supply chains

While Trump’s attitude may strike a chord with those inclined toward protectionism, warning bells are being sounded by economists and trade experts. They warn that creating a “tariff wall” around Southeast Asia would cause major disruptions in global supply chains and raise costs for consumers and businesses in the United States.

There’s still room for countries like Malaysia, Cambodia, and Thailand to haggle for better terms on the way to the negotiations with Washington, said Alicia García Herrero, the chief Asia Pacific economist at Natixis. She said the tariff deal struck with Vietnam should not become a template for the region.

See also Trump's Scott Bessent calls Elon Musk a 'loser,' tells him to quit politics and stick to business

Regardless of the final tariff levels agreed upon, prices for goods exported from Southeast Asia are expected to rise under Trump’s plan. The region remains a major manufacturing hub for US consumer products, making it likely that cost increases will ripple through American markets.

“Manufacturing will get more expensive in Asia generally, but in principle the 20% ‘tariff wall’ might be different across countries where inputs from China are smaller. I don’t think it has to be the same,” she said.

Mark Williams, chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, warned that enforcing the proposed tariffs could be inconsistent and unpredictable. With different rates potentially applied across countries and industries, he said the lack of clarity may lead to confusion and inefficiencies throughout global trade networks.

Williams also added that tariffs on Southeast Asian countries could have unintended consequences. He said that many companies had moved operations from China to countries like Vietnam and Indonesia during the first term of Trump’s presidency to escape the existing tariffs. But he warned that the erection of a new tariff wall could hamper this trend. If the difference between tariffs on China and those in other countries nearby became smaller, he said, the motivation for businesses to move would wane, possibly stalling the momentum of supply chain diversification.

See also Xi and Putin miss BRICS meeting in Brazil amid economic and geopolitical struggles

Rising costs squeeze shoppers under new tariff rules

Even steep tariffs are unlikely to achieve Trump’s goal of returning manufacturing to the US. American industries often lack the scale and cost advantages needed to replace Asian production .

According to Williams, US companies and consumers would face a dilemma: either absorb higher costs for imported goods or go without them. He noted that domestic production remains uncompetitive in many sectors, even with tariffs.

This raises the risk of inflation for American consumers. Since tariffs are essentially taxes on imports, their costs typically fall on consumers. And because global supply chains are deeply intertwined, even minor policy shifts can trigger widespread ripple effects.

At the same time, tougher rules on “trans-shipped” goods—those routed through third countries—could lead to stricter scrutiny once products reach US ports. This, in turn, could pave the way for new industries focused on compliance and processing to emerge.

KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027