Hong Kong to Grant Fewer Than 10 Stablecoin Licenses as August Deadline Approaches
Hong Kong will introduce its new Stablecoin Ordinance in August, limiting full licenses for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers to fewer than 10. Over 40 companies, including major Chinese financial groups and tech giants, are competing for these exclusive positions. The upcoming regulations follow the recent passage of key legislation. This change gives the Hong Kong Monetary … <a href="https://beincrypto.com/hong-kong-stablecoin-license-limit/">Continued</a>
Hong Kong will introduce its new Stablecoin Ordinance in August, limiting full licenses for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers to fewer than 10. Over 40 companies, including major Chinese financial groups and tech giants, are competing for these exclusive positions.
The upcoming regulations follow the recent passage of key legislation. This change gives the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) strong licensing and supervisory powers. This marks a significant shift in how digital assets are managed in the region.
Limited Licenses, Intense Competition
Starting August 1, the Stablecoin Ordinance brings strict supervision for organizations issuing fiat-referenced stablecoins. The HKMA expects to issue only a handful of licenses by the end of 2025, despite a surge of more than 40 applicants. Notably, most are established financial institutions or leading Chinese tech companies pursuing approval under the new system.
This heightened interest highlights Hong Kong’s growing role as a digital finance leader. Since the ordinance passed in May, firms such as Ant Group and JD.com have accelerated efforts to meet the approaching compliance deadline. Demand is especially strong for launching yuan-pegged stablecoins and expanding digital services from Hong Kong’s financial market.
“The Hong Kong Stablecoin Ordinance will officially take effect on August 1 this year. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority will open the license application. It is expected that only a single digit number will be issued, but more than 40 companies are currently preparing to apply. The applicants are basically the largest financial institutions and Internet companies in China.” WuBlockchain said.
With the number of licenses strictly limited, only the most qualified firms can issue fiat-backed stablecoins. This reflects Hong Kong’s intent to safeguard its reputation while supporting responsible innovation.
Elevating Standards: Hong Kong’s Regulatory Approach
The new licensing regime closely follows international standards for financial stability and risk management. Applicants must meet rigorous requirements on reserve asset management, deliver clear redemption guarantees to users, and satisfy advanced anti-money laundering protocols.
For both regulators and industry leaders, these provisions confront ongoing concerns about stablecoin solvency, misconduct, and consumer risk. The HKMA’s recent press release details the legal framework, setting out a six-month transitional period for existing issuers to adapt. This is a vital step to ensure market continuity without losing regulatory grip.
HKMA’s leaders, speaking at a recent industry event, stressed the need for a careful balance between innovation and oversight. Application guidance and enforcement priorities are already public, giving applicants clear expectations.
While the Stablecoin Ordinance advances digital asset regulation, it brings significant implications for issuers and users alike. Limiting licenses is intended to increase confidence in approved stablecoins, prevent unchecked growth, and keep Hong Kong’s reputation as a leading financial center secure.
Existing operations benefit from transitional arrangements, yet unlicensed issuers must exit the market or face enforcement once the grace period ends. The HKMA places consumer protections front and center, while cross-border compliance and anti-money laundering remain crucial for wider financial safety.
As the deadline approaches, decisive action by top tech and finance firms will help shape Hong Kong’s stablecoin landscape. This measured approach has set a high benchmark for other markets, confirming the city’s goal of leading responsibly in the evolving digital asset sector.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

