Chinese creditors challenge FTX over $470 million blockage
- FTX freezes $470 million to creditors in 49 countries
- More than 500 Chinese mobilize for fair distribution
- Fairness and transparency are the focus of the dispute with FTX
More than 500 Chinese creditors are mobilizing against FTX’s recent lawsuit seeking to delay payments to users in jurisdictions with restrictive or uncertain cryptocurrency regulations. The lawsuit directly affects $470 million in distributions, $380 million of which belongs to Chinese investors.
同步下进展:目前群里已有35位小伙伴向法官寄出反对动议,数量还在持续增加!但我觉得还不够,越多越好,欢迎更多中国债权人加入💪
同时,群里的小伙伴也给了我很多支持:
1️⃣ 有人提供了 Mt. Gox 赔偿截图,显示2024年通过 Kraken 向中国 KYC 用户发放了BTC, BCH, PayPal, PayPal, PayPal.
2️⃣…— Will的折腾纪 (@zhetengji) July 8, 2025
The group is appealing to courts and regulators in the United States, claiming that FTX’s decision undermines principles of fairness and breaks promises made during the reorganization process. According to Will, a Chinese creditor who has retained legal representation in the U.S., “many of whom are taking coordinated steps, such as writing letters to the judge and the U.S. trustee, and exploring legal representation for the group.”
4.7 Article
$470 million is not just a cold number — behind it are countless families already hurt once. A second wound is unfolding. We can't stay silent. #FTX #FTXCreditor #CryptoBankruptcy ...
— Will的折腾纪 (@zhetengji) July 7, 2025
So far, 35 members have filed formal letters to the bankruptcy court expressing objections. The central argument is that FTX had assured them that by filing their claims and supporting the restructuring plan, creditors would be entitled to compensation on an equal basis with others.
“We were told clearly: as long as we presented our demands and voted in favor of the plan, we would be entitled to receive our distributions like everyone else,” Will said.
For him, the new attempt to withhold payments based on jurisdiction represents a violation of trust and procedural integrity. “This situation is not only unfair, but also procedurally questionable,” he declared, warning about the risks of creating a discriminatory precedent in the judicial recovery process.
FTX justifies the proposal as a way to avoid legal risks in countries where the use of cryptocurrencies may face restrictions. However, for affected creditors, the measure amounts to a selective exclusion that is at odds with the already approved plan.
Will concluded by stating that the dispute is not just financial, but also a question of fairness and respect for previously agreed rules: “We are not asking for special treatment; we are asking to be treated equally.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

