The labor market is sending false signals
Immigration changes are papering over a fragile labor market
This is a segment from the Forward Guidance newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe .
As is the case with economic data these days, the devil is all in the details.
Today we received the latest jobs report, and the topline data looked fantastic.
- Non-farm payrolls came in at 147k vs. consensus estimates of 100k.
- The unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1%, below forecasts of an increase to 4.3%.
The 4.1% unemployment rate is much stronger than the FOMC’s recent estimates in their June Summary of Economic Projections, and likely takes any possibility of a July cut off the table:
The key vector of what is driving this topline strength in the labor market is a decreasing labor force. This is due to plummeting immigration ever since Trump took office.
Looking at land border crossings, we can see these have cratered.
One year ago, we saw this dynamic in reverse:
- Huge levels of immigration under the Biden administration grew the labor force, which mechanically increased the unemployment rate, since it took time for those new entrants to get a job. And, in the meantime, those new entrants are considered unemployed in BLS data.
- This was what caused the false-positive signal of the Sahm rule that led to the Fed cutting 50bps in quick order.
Putting it together: In the same way that immigration was causing a mechanically weak labor market last September, we now see a mechanically strong labor market.
This dynamic shrouds what’s happening deeper in the data.
Private payrolls came in at 74k, below expectations of 105k. The reason for the significant upside surprise came from government payrolls, which surged to 73k — up from 7k the previous month:
Looking at the industries that drove payroll growth, education and health services continue to bleed lower, which is notable, as these have been the primary driver of payroll growth in recent years.
This delicate balance in the labor market is mostly felt by those who are currently unemployed and finding it extremely difficult to get a new job.
Continuing jobless claims are grinding higher every week amid a labor market that punishes job seekers.
What’s interesting is that the economy isn’t rolling over quite enough to trigger any meaningful layoff cycle. And so, we see that initial jobless claims continue to chop around aimlessly:
Putting this all together, we have a labor market that has some valid issues — but is not bad enough to trigger any sort of meaningful policy response.
It looks increasingly likely that the Fed will continue to sit on its hands and not make any meaningful move in either direction.
Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:
- The Breakdown : Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily.
- Empire : Crypto news and analysis to start your day.
- Forward Guidance : The intersection of crypto, macro and policy.
- 0xResearch : Alpha directly in your inbox.
- Lightspeed : All things Solana.
- The Drop : Apps, games, memes and more.
- Supply Shock : Bitcoin, bitcoin, bitcoin.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

