Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
How the BRICS boys are taking Trump’s new tariff threats after tense phone call with Putin

How the BRICS boys are taking Trump’s new tariff threats after tense phone call with Putin

CryptopolitanCryptopolitan2025/07/07 17:00
By:By Jai Hamid

Share link:In this post: Trump threatened a 10% tariff on countries supporting BRICS after a failed call with Putin. BRICS leaders avoided direct response during the Rio summit, opting for silence and caution. Their joint statement criticized tariffs and military actions but did not name the U.S. directly.

The BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro hit a wall Monday morning when Donald Trump, now back in the White House, threatened to slap 10% tariffs on any country pushing what he called “anti-American” policies.

His comment came just hours before the final day of the meeting hosted by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and three days after what Trump publicly described as a “very disappointing” phone call with Vlad Putin.

According to reporting from Bloomberg, officials from the ten-member BRICS group didn’t engage with the US president’s warning as they headed out of their hotels for the summit’s closing session.

Lula refused to speak to reporters. His senior adviser, Celso Amorim, chose a soft but pointed response, saying the threats “only show the need for an organization like the BRICS,” adding, “we didn’t threaten the US with anything.”

The Putin call made Trump very angry

After the call with Putin, Trump called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday morning, Trump said, “I was not happy with the conversation,” referring to the Thursday call with Putin. “I don’t think he’s looking to stop” the war, Trump added.

On Friday, Trump had a follow-up conversation with Zelenskyy, which the Ukrainian side described as “very important and fruitful.” According to Zelenskyy’s public readout, they talked about Ukraine’s air defense systems, joint defense production, and mutual procurement and investment.

See also Circle's 500% rally has breathed life into dormant IPO market

Despite that, Trump seemed more agitated after the Putin call. The tariff threat dropped not long after, and while he didn’t directly link the two, the BRICS bloc didn’t need him to. Most of the group took the warning for what it was—a signal. No one reacted publicly with anger or confrontation, but the message was received.

Leaders respond quietly as BRICS avoids escalation

Most delegates played it safe. Officials from various BRICS countries said they couldn’t predict Trump’s next move. One diplomat said Trump “might just forget” he posted the threat. Another said the bloc had no choice but to wait.

“Wait and see is the only option,” one delegate said. Even South African President Cyril Ramaphosa bailed early due to a local crisis, skipping his scheduled bilateral with Lula. That move also signaled how countries were being careful not to provoke Washington further.

The group’s final joint statement covered trade, military budgets, and airstrikes on Iran, which joined BRICS last year. They called out “serious concerns” over tariffs and condemned military aggression—but avoided naming the US directly.

Still, Trump responded fast, posting that any nation siding with what he called the “anti-American policies of BRICS” would face a 10% levy. That threat sent emerging market currencies and stocks down early Monday.

See also Leading Spanish bank BBVA to offer BTC and ETH trading through app

Lula’s meeting included not just the core BRICS members but also reps from Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and Vietnam. Saudi’s foreign minister declined to answer questions when approached.

Malaysia’s trade ministry made its position clear, saying it had “an independent foreign and economic policy” and clarified that “the US remains one of Malaysia’s key economic partners.” Amorim said countries were “anchoring themselves in the BRICS in the name of multilateralism.”

That silence speaks volumes. BRICS represents nearly half of the world’s population and a huge slice of the global economy. But with Trump back in power and being the pettiest person on earth, no one’s eager to pick a fight.

KEY Difference Wire : the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027