$8.7 billion in OG bitcoin moved in possible address upgrade, no signs of selling: Arkham
2025/07/06 16:00
More than 80,000 BTC worth over $8.7 billion were transferred after 14 years of dormancy on Friday, sparking speculation around the potential ownership and reason for the sudden movement. According to the onchain analytics platform Arkham , the transfers may simply be related to address upgrades, and there is no indication the whale is selling bitcoin.
Two addresses holding 10,000 BTC each, valued at just $7,800 when their initial inbound transfer was received in April 2011, woke up first. Over the 14 years of dormancy, the 10,000 BTC in each wallet has appreciated by 13,982,800% in value, rising to nearly $1.1 billion.
Lookonchain suggested the same entity controlled both addresses, as well as six other addresses that also received around 10,000 BTC each on May 4, 2011, when the price of bitcoin had risen to $3.37. Those six addresses then subsequently transferred their 10,000 BTC later on Friday.
Wild speculation about the owner of the substantial bitcoin stash followed, with suggestions from "Bitcoin Jesus" turned Bitcoin Cash evangelist Roger Ver to the CIA and Satoshi Nakamoto themself being behind the transfers.
Coinbase Director of Product Strategy and Business Operations said the bitcoin appeared to originate from a single miner in 2011 — noting that they had an address with 200,000 BTC in it at one point, worth $22 billion today. Grogan later suggested there is a small possibility the funds were hacked via compromised private keys, pointing to an initial BCH test transaction from one of the clusters — also leading to the Roger Ver speculation. "There is a possibility that the owner was testing the private key in a way that wouldn't get noticed, as BCH isn't monitored heavily by whale-watching services," he wrote on X.
Bitcoin address upgrades?
None of the receiving addresses have moved the funds again so far, and there is no indication of mixer use or other activity that may indicate foul play. Arkham noted that the majority of the funds had moved from legacy Bitcoin addresses to bech32 addresses, indicating that the owner may have finally just rotated to a more secure modern address format, given the substantial value.
"These coins date back to 2011, before the BIP39 standard existed," Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet noted following the transfers. "Back then, private keys were managed individually per address, with no hardware wallet support (even today)," he explained. "This suggests the keys were stored in a wallet.dat file, and the transaction was likely signed using a software wallet like Electrum. From a security standpoint, this is absolutely insane!"
Legacy bitcoin wallet.dat addresses are less secure because early Bitcoin Core used outdated key generation, with weak random number generators and often uncompressed public keys. These flaws made private keys easier to guess and public keys more exposed to certain attacks. Hackers could exploit poor randomness, key reuse, or leaks to try and crack them. Modern wallets are safer thanks to stronger randomness, hierarchical deterministic key derivation, and newer address formats introduced with SegWit in 2017.
Starting with a 1, these legacy Pay-to-PubKey-Hash (P2PKH) addresses are the oldest style of bitcoin addresses. After that came Pay-to-Script-Hash (P2SH) addresses starting with 3, then native SegWit (P2WPKH) addresses starting with bc1q, and finally Taproot (P2TR) addresses starting with bc1p — the most up-to-date format.
However, while the upgraded address format theory is a possible explanation, one of the 10,000 BTC transfers was sent to another legacy address rather than a more modern format, so it may not be the only one. The exact reason for the transfers, as well as the owner's identity, remains uncertain.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.
Crypto prices
More
