Hong Kong eyes stablecoin licenses this year, but approvals likely to remain in ‘single digits’: report
Quick Take Hong Kong may issue stablecoin licenses this year, but the number of licenses granted is expected to remain limited, according to a local media report. The city’s stablecoin licensing regime is set to take effect on Aug. 1.
Hong Kong may issue stablecoin licenses this year, but the number is likely to remain "in the single digits," the region's top financial official said in a local media interview.
In an interview with local newspaper Ming Pao published Monday, Christopher Hui, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, said that with the stablecoin licensing regime set to take effect in August, the authorities aim to issue licenses within this year.
"We hope that [stablecoins] will focus on addressing the difficulties and pain points in the real economy, such as cross-border payments, especially when involving local currencies with higher risks, or when the local financial system is not so well-developed, creating certain challenges for cross-border payments," said Hui in the report.
"However, if there are stablecoins based on fiat currencies serving as effective payment tools, they can facilitate cross-border transactions and reduce transaction costs," he added.
While the upcoming licensing regime and earlier sandbox programs were initially designed for stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar, the prospect of offshore yuan-pegged stablecoins has become a hot topic in the local crypto industry.
Chinese tech giants JD.com and Ant Group, for example, are lobbying China's central bank to approve offshore yuan-based stablecoins as the global stablecoin race intensifies, according to Reuters .
Hui told Ming Pao that if a potential stablecoin involves a currency from another jurisdiction, "we must engage in discussions with the relevant authorities."
The current regulatory framework generally permits stablecoin issuance when backed by legal tender without explicitly restricting which currencies can serve as backing assets, Hui said. However, when currencies from other jurisdictions are involved, regulators must carefully assess the potential impact on exchange rates and consider broader risk factors, according to Hui.
Hong Kong's push for a stablecoin licensing framework coincides with ongoing regulatory developments in the U.S. Last month, the U.S. Senate passed the landmark GENIUS stablecoin bill, advancing it to the House, with President Donald Trump urging Congress to pass the legislation.
China's central bank governor, Pan Gongsheng, also acknowledged that stablecoins and central bank digital currencies are reshaping the global payment infrastructure.
While Beijing upholds its ban on crypto trading and mining across mainland China, Hong Kong has taken the opposite stance by welcoming crypto businesses through an established licensing framework for crypto exchanges. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the region's de facto central bank, launched a stablecoin sandbox last year, drawing participation from prominent firms, including Standard Chartered Bank, Animoca Brands, Hong Kong Telecommunications, JD Coinlink, and RD InnoTech.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

