Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Vitalik Buterin proposes a low Ethereum gas limit

Vitalik Buterin proposes a low Ethereum gas limit

2025/07/07 02:00
By:

Vitalik Buterin along with fellow researcher Toni Wahrstätter have proposed EIP 7983 which caps the Ethereum transaction gas limit to 16.77 million or (2^24). 

The proposal was created on GitHub in late June and was finalized today. EIP 7983 states that the gas limit will affect the Ethereum network at the protocol level. The new gas cap will help in securing and stabilizing the Ethereum network while making transaction costs more predictable. 

EIP 7983 will protect the network from DoS attacks

Theoretically, a single transaction on the Ethereum network could consume the entire block’s gas limit. For example, a smart contract interaction might fill a block completely, leaving no room for other transactions. This could pose several risks including denial-of-service (DoS) attacks which impact the Ethereum network stability.

Capping the gas limit will break transactions into smaller fragments, hence improving zkVM compatibility. This design change will lead to faster zero-knowledge proofs and more participants to help verify work. In addition, a stable gas usage will balance parallel execution across threads in future Ethereum scaling models.

Overall, having a maximum gas limit of 16.77 million will help stop denial-of-service attacks, make zkVMs easier to design, and allow gas to be shared more fairly between transactions in each block.

See also SharpLink Gaming leads the Ethereum rush with $525M+ ETH purchases

EIP-7983 further states that the transaction cap limit will be enforced regardless of the block gas limit set by validators. Moreover, any transaction that exceeds the gas limit of 16.77 million will be rejected with a specific error code. 

According to the proposal, the EVM behavior will change and will not include any transaction with a gas limit more than 16.77 million in the txpool. A txpool is defined as a waiting room for ETH transactions . At the block validation level and before the processing stage, the EVM will reject any block that has a transaction with a gas limit greater than the specified limit. 

Why 16.77 million Ethereum gas limit?

In the proposal, Buterin and Wahrstätter wrote that the transaction gas limit of 16.77 million or (2^24) “provides a balance between allowing complex transactions while maintaining predictable execution bounds.” Selecting this value will make use cases like smart contract deployments and complex DeFi transactions run smoothly without causing unpredictable slowdowns.

EIP-7983 is not the first proposal to introduce a cap on ETH gas limit. EIP-7825 was the first proposal to introduce a gas limit for Ethereum transactions of 30 million. The proposal was published in November of last year and the 30 million gas cap was selected at the time because it is based on the average size of Ethereum blocks today. Many Ethereum developers supported EIP-7825 however they pushed for a lower gas limit. 

See also Ethereum-linked stocks rise as tokenization and stablecoin hype returns

According to the Gas Tracker on Ether Scan, the average Ethereum gas cost is 0.266 gwei while ETH is priced at around $2,550. At the time of writing, a transaction that uses the full 16.77 million gas would cost approximately $11.38. 

Cryptopolitan Academy: Tired of market swings? Learn how DeFi can help you build steady passive income. Register Now

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027