Europe Hopes To Avoid The Worst: A Possible Agreement With The USA This Weekend?
At a time when trade tensions are reshaping global power dynamics, Europe faces a direct threat: Washington is imposing a July 9 ultimatum to conclude a bilateral agreement. After this deadline, surtaxes potentially reaching 70% would fall on European exports as of August 1st. In this high-tension climate, Brussels is trying to avoid a direct clash with an American administration determined to impose its rules. An express negotiation is underway to avoid a shift into a tariff confrontation.
An ultimatum and customs escalation
As the countdown begins before the July 9 deadline set by Donald Trump, negotiations between Washington and its trade partners , including the European Union, are intensifying.
This Saturday, the French Minister of Economy, Éric Lombard, spoke to emphasize the seriousness of the situation. He declared :
I hope we will have an agreement this weekend. Otherwise, Europe will probably have to show more strength in its response to restore balance.
A delegation from the European Commission is currently in Washington aiming to defuse the threat of tariff sanctions. The alert is clear: without a quick agreement, punitive customs measures will apply to European exports to the United States.
These sanctions announced by Donald Trump date back to early April, when he proposed a unilateral reform of U.S. foreign trade. At that time, he temporarily suspended the application of these increases to allow for bilateral discussions. However, the American president confirmed last Friday an imminent tightening. Here is what is now on the table:
- Punitive customs duties applicable from August 1st, 2025, in the absence of a trade agreement;
- Customs surtaxes ranging from 10% to 70%, depending on the targeted countries;
- The sending of 12 official letters starting Monday, targeting major trade partners, including the European Union;
- A targeting criterion based on trade imbalances, notably countries exporting more to the United States than they import from it.
The American approach, based on a bilateral logic, breaks with the multilateral regulatory principles defended so far by the WTO. For the European Union, this offensive strategy directly calls into question its ability to protect its industrial and strategic interests against a historic partner that has become unpredictable.
Europe called to defend itself: towards a return of protectionism?
Beyond the attempt at de-escalation, Éric Lombard stated that Europe must prepare to respond firmly. “Europe will probably have to show more strength”, he insisted, emphasizing that restoring a balanced power dynamic is essential.
He thus considers it “essential” for the Union to erect its own customs barriers, both against the United States and against other economic powers like China, which is also accused of distorting the commercial playing field. Far from limiting his remarks to the American case, Lombard sketches a broader vision: that of an economic world governed by raw power dynamics, where multilateral rules no longer apply.
The minister illustrated his point with a striking metaphor, comparing the current situation to “a playground where everyone plays hopscotch with supervisors and respecting the rules. And there are three bullies who arrive and no longer respect any rule.” In this picture, the “bullies” are clearly identified: the United States, China, and Russia.
This image conveys a deep concern: that of a global trade disorder where European economies, still attached to the WTO legal framework, risk being marginalized if they do not respond.
On financial markets, the climate of uncertainty is also fueling moves towards alternative assets. Bitcoin, often seen as a safe haven against geopolitical tensions and unstable monetary policies, could benefit from a tightening of trade relations.
A transatlantic tariff war would strengthen distrust towards state currencies, increasing the appeal of decentralized cryptocurrencies such as BTC. Institutional investors are closely monitoring the development of negotiations, aware that failure could revive volatility and reposition digital assets at the heart of hedging strategies.
The consequences of this tension could be significant. An increase in customs duties, currently suspended by Trump , would severely penalize European exporters while fueling imported inflation on the Old Continent. In the medium term, this could strengthen Europe’s will to build strategic autonomy, both industrial and monetary. In this uncertain context, markets, including cryptos, will have to integrate new geopolitical and tariff variables. The return of protectionism, if confirmed, could durably reshape trade flows and encourage more sovereign economic policies.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

