Bitcoin just printed a $20K monthly candle — Its biggest ever in USD
Bitcoin is still short of all-time highs after its incredible February gains, but bulls have already set a new record.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Mar. 1, Checkmate, the pseudonymous lead on-chain analyst at Glassnode, revealed a “remarkable” BTC price event.
BTC price supplies “unreal” monthly candle
The Feb. 29 monthly close sealed a clear win for Bitcoin bulls.
At 43.55%, per data from CoinGlass, February has delivered the biggest gains for BTC/USD since December 2020.
BTC/USD monthly returns (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass
In absolute terms, however, the picture is even more encouraging, Checkmate noted.
Referring to monthly performance alongside Glassnode data, he showed that February resulted in a monthly candle nearly $20,000 high.
“Unreal...Feb 2024 printed a $19.84k Bitcoin candle, the largest monthly USD increase in history,” he wrote in accompanying comments.
“This added $390B to the Bitcoin market cap... Up a remarkable 47%.”
Bitcoin monthly close data. Source: Checkmate/X
For context, $20,000 formed an all-time high BTC price level in itself — one that, after appearing in December 2017, remained unbeaten for three years. It took Bitcoin most of a decade to get there.
BTC price “plunge protection” centers on $52,000
As Cointelegraph reported, the monthly close had been a source of angst among market participants.
Related: Despite 23% gains, Bitcoin options traders still not bullish
Monthly candles can spark volatility as they expire — potentially a problem for Bitcoin in its current state, as order books lack substantial bid liquidity to act as support.
A snapshot of BTC/USDT order book liquidity on the largest global exchange, Binance, uploaded to X on Feb. 29 by trading resource Material Indicators shows $59,000 as the nearest potential safety net.
BTC/USDT order book liquidity for Binance. Source: Material Indicators/X
Continuing in his own analysis, Material Indicators co-founder Keith Alan additionally revealed major changes in order book composition at lower levels.
A raft of bids, which had previously appeared in the mid-$20,000 zone, as Cointelegraph reported, has been moved up to $52,000.
“In the last 24 hours we’ve seen the most significant change in the order book since January,” he summarized on X.
“A rip to $64k and a 49% Monthly candle wasn’t on anybody’s bingo card, neither was wick down to $58k or nearly $8B in BTCETF inflows that pushed price much further beyond $60k than most of us expected.”
Alan referred to a key event in the latter half of last month — the spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, raking in record net inflows.
Bitcoin traded at $61,600 at the time of writing, with volatility staying manageable after the monthly close, per data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView.
BTC/USD 1-month chart. Source:
TradingView
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After the "Black Week" for tech stocks, Wall Street calls for "bottom fishing"
Morgan Stanley has made it clear that "the next two to three weeks are the time to increase positions." Ed Yardeni characterizes the current downturn as a "correction" rather than the bursting of a bubble. Major Wall Street institutions have an average year-end target for the S&P 500 of 7,973 points. However, most strategists believe that the direction of AI policy remains the largest variable.

CoreWeave writes to Texas governor-elect seeking "data center consultation"
In this open letter, Michael Intrator stated that CoreWeave "strongly supports" Hinojosa's principled position that the growth of data centers must benefit the people of Texas. "We welcome the opportunity to work with your transition team to responsibly advance approved projects and to establish clear and lasting standards for future developments," he said.


What Would Bitcoin Look Like Without the Trump Effect?

