Major U.S. Banks Restrict AI Agents’ Access to Customer Accounts Over Deposit Outflow Concerns
JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Bank of America moved to restrict third-party AI agents from managing customer funds amid concerns that deposits could shift to banks offering higher interest rates.
Citigroup and Bank of America joined JPMorgan Chase in restricting unrestricted access to bank accounts by third-party AI agents. The financial institutions are concerned about potential deposit outflows and security risks associated with automated transfers, according to the Financial Times.
Executives at major U.S. banks contacted the Federal Reserve to express concerns about the growing number of financial transactions carried out by AI agents on behalf of customers. Questions remain about how customers should authorize such systems to execute transactions and who would be held liable for potential errors.
Bank of America CEO
JPMorgan Chase CEO
Citigroup banned third-party AI agents from independently logging into customer accounts or executing transactions. However, customers can still authorize certain financial service providers to access account information without permission to move funds.
Banks’ concerns intensified after Meta launched its Muse AI personal assistant in September 2026. Such systems can automatically compare financial institutions’ offerings and transfer customers’ idle cash to accounts offering the highest yields.
Apollo Chief Economist
According to Slok’s estimates:
- The average interest rate on U.S. checking accounts is 0.1% annually, compared with yields of 3.3% to 5% on alternative accounts.
- JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo hold a combined $1.6 trillion in non-interest-bearing deposits, representing 16% of their total liabilities.
- Paying 3% interest on these deposits would cost the 3 banks about $47 billion annually, equivalent to nearly half their combined annual profits.
As AI-powered financial assistants become more widespread, banks may need to rethink their customer retention strategies.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
"Predicting Your Prediction" Intensifies Tech Stock Sell-off! After $2.3 Trillion Market Value Evaporates, Has the "Hot Money" Mechanical Selling Still Not Subsided?
The Nasdaq 100 Index fell by 6.4%, wiping out $2.3 trillion in market capitalization. The core reason behind this decline is concerns that a comprehensive victory by the Democratic Party could lead to stricter regulations on AI development. Systematic funds, which typically follow the stock market's trend and respond to price fluctuations and momentum signals, were thus forced to reduce their investments, accelerating the downturn. The selling pressure from systematic strategies may not be over yet; it is expected that in the coming days, portfolios targeting volatility will sell at least $50 billion worth of stocks.
The midterm election tears open the "abyss" of AI trading, facing a moment of reckoning for trillion-dollar capital expenditure narratives
For months, investors have been worried about a series of risks behind the AI (artificial intelligence) capital expenditure "money tree." This week, the market finally pressed the panic selling button.

AI sell-off meets the NFP test: safe-haven funds flock to the bond market! Will unexpectedly strong employment disrupt the bullish U.S. Treasury setup?
As expectations for further rate hikes by the Federal Reserve continue to diminish, bond traders are preparing for the upcoming October jobs report this Friday, with the U.S. Treasury market expected to rise further. The global stock sell-off has prompted investors to seek the safety of U.S. Treasuries, pushing yields down to their lowest levels since early September, with the 10-year Treasury yield reported at 4.82% on Friday.

