The Securities and Exchange Commission charged two former Wall Street investment bankers on Friday, following stock trades made ahead of South Jersey Industries’ acquisition announcement in February 2022. The allegations involve trades and profits that the SEC describes as classic insider trading violations.
SEC charges two ex-investment bankers with $18.5 million insider trading scheme
Satsky and Wolfe accused of exploiting acquisition information
According to the SEC, Mark Satsky, 59, served as a senior banker specializing in energy and utilities at a prominent New York bank and played a lead role in South Jersey Industries’ business. The agency claims Satsky communicated with David Wolfe, 55, a friend and former colleague, in the period leading up to a takeover of South Jersey Industries.
Investigators allege Wolfe purchased approximately 2.2 million shares of South Jersey Industries between November and December 2021, at a cost of over $53 million. These trades, conducted before the public announcement of Infrastructure Investments Fund’s $8.1 billion deal to take South Jersey private at $36 per share, generated an $18.5 million profit after South Jersey’s stock surged nearly 40 percent on the news.
The SEC asserts that Satsky and Wolfe discussed a potential company acquisition on several occasions, including during a widely broadcast college basketball game attended with their wives.
Wolfe is accused of trading through eight entities linked to his family’s assets, including Evergreen Capital and GAW Holdings, to conceal the source and scale of his purchases.
Both men left Credit Suisse for Bank of America in 2012, and Evergreen Capital is reported to manage Wolfe family interests.
Mini dictionary: Evergreen Capital, an asset management firm managing family investments, was cited by the SEC as one of several entities allegedly used by Wolfe to carry out trades seen as disguising his involvement.
Regulator inquiry leads to investigation and firings
The SEC’s complaint describes efforts by the two individuals to hide their activities. After the South Jersey Industries takeover was announced, a regulatory inquiry prompted Bank of America to launch an internal review into unusual trading patterns. Bank of America discharged Satsky in March 2025 after the investigation.
Manhattan’s U.S. Attorney’s office has been examining the same transaction since at least spring 2024. No criminal charges have been filed at this stage.
Satsky’s lawyer, Robert Anello, stated that his client firmly denies the SEC’s claims and insists he did not disclose any confidential information to Wolfe regarding the takeover. Separately, Wolfe’s attorney, Reed Brodsky, rejected the accusations, contending that the SEC ignored testimony and evidence that his client made the investments based on his independent analysis.
Legal representatives for both Satsky and Wolfe have challenged the SEC’s narrative, with each maintaining their client’s innocence regarding the insider trading allegations.
SEC boosts insider trading enforcement under Atkins
The case aligns with the SEC’s stated intent to increase focus on insider trading, market manipulation, fiduciary duty breaches, and accounting fraud, as emphasized under current commissioner Paul Atkins. The SEC recently formed a Financial Reporting and Accounting Unit within its Enforcement Division to better target such violations.
Cornerstone Research reported a roughly 60 percent decline in overall enforcement actions after Atkins assumed office in April 2025. Meanwhile, crypto-related financial penalties dropped to $142 million in 2025, less than 3 percent of the previous year’s total.
The charges brought against Satsky and Wolfe allege violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bans for both men, as well as disgorgement and prejudgment interest from Wolfe and a conduct-based injunction on Satsky.
| Mark Satsky | Senior Banker, Energy & Utility Unit | N/A | N/A | Permanent injunction, civil penalty, officer/director bar, conduct injunction |
| David Wolfe | Former Banker | $18.5 million | 8 family entities (e.g., Evergreen Capital, GAW Holdings) | Permanent injunction, civil penalty, officer/director bar, disgorgement, prejudgment interest |
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Retail Investors Can Short AI-Related Debt? High-Leverage CDS ETF Launches, but Analysts Remain Skeptical
Two institutions plan to launch leveraged ETFs tied to CDS of AI companies, betting on credit defaults; Oracle's CDS volume has surged from $8.7 billion to $47.6 billion this year.

Wall Street is divided over Nvidia (NVDA.US): Some see a "once-in-a-lifetime buying opportunity," while others worry about Huang Renxun being "irreplaceable."
Nvidia's (NVDA.US) forward P/E ratio has fallen below 10x—a valuation typical for companies in structural decline, now seen at a firm widely regarded as the "core of the AI revolution."

Global banks commit $270M to stablecoin venture targeting 2027 launch

The "Quantum Computing" Halo Can't Offset Fundamentals Growth Disappointment! Rigetti (RGTI.US) Fell Over 9% After Hours; Fidelity Meets Standards but Revenue Misses Expectations by 60%
This technology company focused on quantum computing has achieved its technical milestones, but its revenue falls far short of market consensus expectations. It has encountered significant setbacks in revenue, losses, and order acceptance progress, causing its stock price to drop by over 9% in after-hours trading on the US stock market.
