The Key to Jensen Huang's 500 Billion Gamble: Can Chips Disrupt the Inevitable Depreciation of Tech Products?
This gamble involves securitizing the debt rights from AI chip rentals to create a new financial asset. The core logic is that chip demand, driven by the AI boom, will sustain high prices for a longer period. Jensen Huang uses the unexpectedly strong value retention of A100 chips as justification and promises a 25% residual value guarantee. The fundamental risk lies in the fast-paced chip technology iteration and uncertain demand, raising doubts about whether the rapid depreciation of tech products can be broken.
Nvidia is joining forces with Wall Street to bet on a disruptive proposition: can AI chips break the long-standing financial rule that tech products depreciate rapidly?
Wallstreetcn reported that this week Nvidia announced a partnership with Wall Street giants, including Apollo, Blackstone, BlackRock’s GIP, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and KKR, forming a consortium to raise up to $500 billion for AI infrastructure projects. The funds will be used for AI chip procurement, power generation, and data center construction, with financial giants providing semiconductor leasing financing for technology companies.
On August 13, according to the Financial Times, financial executives involved in the deal revealed that the core logic of the plan is: the ongoing AI frenzy will keep chip prices at elevated levels for much longer than most analysts previously predicted. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stated that this deal will create a new asset class with chips as the underlying asset, opening the doors to the $22 trillion private capital industry.
However, this grand vision faces fundamental risks: it remains unknown whether financial institutions can accurately judge the longevity of demand and long-term value for Nvidia’s chips. Unlike leasing cars or commercial planes, chip technology evolves rapidly, demand is volatile, and their long-term value is highly uncertain. This $500 billion bet is, in essence, a historic wager on whether demand for AI computing power will persist, and whether chips can become reliable financial assets.
Deal Structure: Private Capital Enters, Nvidia Transfers Off-Balance Sheet Pressure
The core structure of the deal is to securitize chip leasing receivables and sell them to debt buyers like insurance companies.
According to the Financial Times, private equity firms like Apollo, KKR, and Brookfield plan to package GPU lease contracts into securities, leveraging their managed insurance asset pools to raise large-scale funds. Some institutions are considering establishing dedicated financing vehicles and, referring to the commonly used collateralized loan obligation (CLO) structure in private equity buyouts, tranche the chip assets for investors with varying risk preferences.
“You can finance GPUs in tranches, just like a CLO,” said an executive involved in the transaction, but some are cautious, noting, “Each institution will have different financing approaches.”
For Nvidia, this arrangement also carries significant financial implications. Bank of America research analyst Vivek Arya pointed out this week that Wall Street’s financial involvement means Nvidia can gradually exit its “vendor financing” model—where Nvidia previously directly guaranteed client financing and facilitated their access to capital markets.
“The burden is borne by the consortium, not Nvidia’s balance sheet,” Arya said, adding that this is clearly positive for Nvidia.
Core Debate: Can Chips Break Technology Depreciation Rule?
The greatest uncertainty of this deal lies in whether the long-term value of chip assets is sufficient to support financialization.
Traditional finance has always been cautious toward technology assets. Currently, for chip-lease-backed debt, most lenders require full repayment within three to five years, based on the assumption that: the underlying assets will be worth close to zero after that period. Unlike cars or commercial aircraft leases, which have a mature secondary market in case of client default, obsolete chips have virtually no reliable buyers.
Silicon Valley-based Creative Strategies analyst Ben Bajarin bluntly stated the risk:
“The whole scheme is predicated on continued investment. There is a risk of overbuilding, demand may slow, or models may improve enough that less computing power is required.”
Additionally, chip buyers or lessees must build data centers in parallel, meaning expected revenue streams will significantly lag spending plans, further intensifying cash flow pressures.
Nvidia’s Reply: Old Chips Are Still Creating Value
Facing skepticism, Jensen Huang backed his logic with real data.
Wallstreetcn reported that on Monday, Huang posted on social platform X, stating that rental prices for Nvidia's recent chips have risen, and even the six-year-old A100 chip is still in use—outliving its original expected life. He has also repeatedly emphasized that even older H100 chips are retaining value far better than the market expected, driven by explosive demand for computing power.
Nvidia’s strategy doesn’t stop there. The company continually updates its Cuda software platform to proactively extend chip lifespans. Cuda is Nvidia’s core for maintaining its AI processing dominance, enabling customers to use GPUs originally designed for graphics to accelerate AI applications.
Bajarin believes robust demand across chip categories is likely to support Nvidia’s plan in the medium term, while long-term success hinges on continued reduction of total cost of ownership for Nvidia products.
In terms of risk-sharing, Nvidia has also made a substantive commitment: guaranteeing at least 25% residual value for chips during the lease period, with the $5.3 trillion market cap chip giant absorbing initial losses.
According to the Financial Times, an executive involved in the $500 billion transaction said, “GPUs have intrinsic value. Nvidia has a ten-year track record for GPU lease pricing,” and characterized Nvidia’s guarantee as the “first-loss protection” for future financing, meaning the company absorbs early value losses beyond expectations.
Despite the risks, Wall Street’s enthusiasm has been ignited.
Blackstone’s Jon Gray and BlackRock’s Larry Fink have both stated publicly that their firms are looking to deploy capital to capture the immense demand for new data centers—which will be used to train and run the latest AI models.
The report noted that another executive working with Nvidia expects GPU leasing to drive pricing standardization and generate economies of scale for AI firms. He said, as “people figure things out,” even public debt market investors will eventually enter the space, enhancing the liquidity and tradability of this asset class.
Analysts believe the key to this process is whether the market can form a consensus on the long-term value of chips. If Nvidia’s 25% residual value guarantee withstands market tests, chip lease securitization may become another mainstream asset class born from the AI investment wave, following data center infrastructure debt. But if demand for AI cools and computing power growth slows, this $500 billion wager led by Jensen Huang will face a stern stress test.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization
Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

