Funds lead year-to-date growth in tokenized market cap by $7B
Three tokenized funds from the biggest names in traditional finance have collectively added roughly $7.1 billion in market cap since the start of the year, making the fund category the single largest driver of growth across the entire tokenized asset landscape.
BlackRock’s BUIDL, Circle’s USYC, and Franklin Templeton’s iBENJI now sit at a combined active market cap of approximately $7.23 billion. That figure accounts for a staggering share of the total on-chain tokenized asset market, which currently ranges between $33.9 billion and $36.7 billion depending on the tracking platform.
The big three, by the numbers
Circle’s USYC leads the pack with an active market cap of around $3 billion. BlackRock’s BUIDL follows at roughly $2.7 billion. Franklin Templeton’s iBENJI rounds out the trio at approximately $1.5 billion.
Each of these products is essentially a blockchain-native wrapper around traditional money-market or treasury instruments.
Wall Street showed up, but DeFi didn’t get an invite
Despite sitting on billions in tokenized assets, these funds have almost zero interaction with decentralized finance protocols. DeFi utilization for the three major funds hovers between 0% and 1.05%, according to data tracked by DeFiLlama.
The vast majority of holdings remain in custody or direct wallets, functioning more like digital certificates of deposit than active DeFi building blocks.
Compare that to the credit-focused corner of the tokenized asset market. Smaller players like Maple and Janus Henderson’s tokenized credit offerings show DeFi utilization rates ranging from 50% to 97%. Those tokens are actively deployed as composable collateral across protocols.
The contrast creates a two-tier system within tokenized real-world assets. On one level, you have massive institutional funds that use blockchain rails for issuance and record-keeping but treat the DeFi ecosystem like a velvet rope they’d rather not cross. On another level, smaller credit-focused tokens are deeply embedded in on-chain lending and borrowing markets.
What this signals for tokenized assets
The low DeFi utilization rate reveals the current state of institutional tokenization. The promise of tokenized real-world assets has always been composability: the idea that a tokenized Treasury bill could serve as collateral in a lending protocol, which could then be rehypothecated into a structured product, all without leaving the blockchain. That vision remains almost entirely theoretical for the largest funds in the space.
If even a fraction of BUIDL or USYC’s market cap eventually becomes composable within DeFi, the liquidity implications for on-chain lending markets would be significant. A 5% utilization rate across $7 billion in tokenized fund assets would inject roughly $350 million in new collateral into DeFi protocols.
The concentration of growth in just three funds raises questions about market structure. When three products from three issuers account for the majority of a sector’s year-to-date expansion, any regulatory action targeting one of these issuers, or a significant redemption event, could ripple across the broader tokenized asset market in ways that a more distributed landscape would absorb more easily.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Fear is the biggest short! Morgan Stanley calls for bottom-fishing in semiconductors: land and electricity shortages are not a problem, approved projects can't meet demand
Morgan Stanley believes that the recent sell-off in the semiconductor sector has been excessive, and that market panic rather than fundamentals is the biggest risk. Driven by demand for AI infrastructure, downstream orders continue to accelerate, with semiconductor supply remaining the core bottleneck. LPS constraints actually make growth more stable. The sector may fluctuate within a range in the short term and is currently near the bottom; prospects for the computing power and storage subsectors are favorable.

Indian Rupee extends rally amid continued FIIs buying, lower oil prices

Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization
Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

