The ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP), a leveraged exchange-traded fund seeking to deliver double the daily performance of the Bloomberg XRP Index, has fallen sharply since its launch in July 2025. The fund has declined more than 94%, reflecting ongoing challenges for XRP-focused investment products.
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF plunges 95%, spot ETFs also hit by XRP market slump
UXRP struggles highlight razor-sharp risks of leverage
As of early August 2026, UXRP was trading around $10.30, marking a steep drop of approximately 95.5% from its 52-week high of $231.20. This plunge outpaced XRP’s own slide, as the digital asset hovered around $1, according to CoinGecko.
UXRP is structured to magnify XRP’s daily price changes using derivatives. Unlike traditional ETFs, leveraged funds like this are specifically tailored for daily trading and are not suited to long-term investors. The ETF’s leverage resets at the end of each trading day, which can lead to long-term performance diverging sharply from the underlying cryptocurrency.
This divergence results from volatility drag—also called beta slippage—where leveraged ETFs lose ground in unsettled or sideways trading conditions.
Mini dictionary: Volatility drag (beta slippage), a compounding effect in leveraged ETFs where returns trail both the leveraged and unleveraged assets when market conditions are volatile, due to the daily resetting of leverage.
UXRP amplifies XRP’s daily moves via derivatives, but its long-term performance can lag far behind XRP itself due to volatility drag—making it unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors.
Leveraged ETFs like UXRP are widely used by active traders or quantitative investors seeking to capitalize on short-term price swings. Despite this, a niche group of retail traders and traders involved in the Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE) movement have occasionally chosen to hold leveraged funds, sometimes achieving outsized gains in bull markets, like those seen with the TQQQ (3x leveraged Nasdaq-100 ETF) from 2010 to 2021. However, leveraged funds can underperform over time if markets remain volatile or move against their position.
| UXRP | 2x | $10.30 | $231.20 | 95.5% |
| XRP | None | ~$1.00 | — | — |
Spot XRP ETFs experience tough year as market weakens
Spot XRP ETFs have also suffered throughout 2026, in line with broad weakness in the digital asset market. The arrival and approval of these spot ETFs in late 2025 was regarded as a landmark in cryptocurrency regulation, giving both institutional and retail investors regulated access to XRP without having to manage digital wallets or private keys.
Since their rollout, spot XRP ETFs have attracted $1.5 billion in cumulative initial inflows. Despite healthy early interest, the subsequent downturn in XRP’s price has put significant pressure on these products.
All leading spot XRP ETFs have posted year-to-date losses of more than 40% as of August 2026, with the market downturn affecting all major players.
The Bitwise XRP ETF, holding about $304 million in assets under management, has dropped around 43.2% since the start of the year. Canary Capital’s XRPC fund, which manages nearly $248.9 million, has also lost about 40.4% year-to-date.
| Bitwise XRP ETF | $304 million | -43.2% |
| Canary Capital XRPC | $248.9 million | -40.4% |
Despite the losses, these spot ETFs continue to attract modest inflows, indicating that some investors remain optimistic or are averaging down in anticipation of a market rebound.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
