Bitcoin tests market patience as Zcash offers renewed hope
Bitcoin is trading around $62,700 as of early August 2026, sitting roughly 9% below a technical formation that has historically made crypto investors lose sleep. The 20-week exponential moving average, currently near $68,806, is on the verge of crossing below the 200-week EMA at approximately $68,220, a pattern known as a death cross.
Meanwhile, Zcash is writing a very different story. After a brutal 50% single-day crash in early June, the privacy coin has clawed its way back into the $460 to $517 range.
Bitcoin’s death cross dilemma
A death cross occurs when a shorter-term moving average dips below a longer-term one, and it’s generally interpreted as a bearish signal. In Bitcoin’s case, the 20-week EMA and 200-week EMA are separated by less than $600, which means the crossover could happen any week now, or Bitcoin could rally just enough to prevent it entirely.
Bitcoin death crosses on the weekly timeframe have occasionally preceded sharp selloffs, but they’ve also sometimes marked the bottom of a consolidation phase before a rally. Bitcoin is trading at $62,700 while both moving averages hover near $68,500, meaning the market is already trading well below its trend lines.
Zcash’s crash, fix, and comeback
On June 4, ZEC was trading around $624. By June 5, it had been cut nearly in half to roughly $309. The culprit was the disclosure of a long-hidden soundness flaw in the Orchard shielded pool, one of Zcash’s core privacy features.
The vulnerability was never actually exploited. The Zcash development team moved quickly, deploying an emergency fix and outlining an upgrade path called Ironwood that addresses the underlying issues more comprehensively.
From the $309 low, ZEC has recovered to a range between $460 and $517 by early August, representing a rebound of roughly 50% to 67% from the crash floor. The $480 to $500 zone appears to be the next major resistance.
What this means for investors
Bitcoin still accounts for a dominant share of total crypto market capitalization, and when its technical picture deteriorates, correlations tend to tighten. Death crosses are lagging indicators by definition. The most productive thing to watch isn’t the moving average crossover itself but rather whether Bitcoin can reclaim the $68,000 to $69,000 zone where both EMAs currently sit. A move back above those levels would invalidate the bearish signal entirely.
For traders evaluating ZEC, the key question is whether the Ironwood upgrade path delivers on its promises. The price recovery from $309 to the $460 to $517 range is encouraging, but it’s built on trust that still needs to be earned back fully.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.
$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
Crypto prices
More
