Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Yellow Chairman Who Is Bullish on Both XRP & Linea Clears Major Confusion

Yellow Chairman Who Is Bullish on Both XRP & Linea Clears Major Confusion

TimesTabloidTimesTabloid2026/07/12 09:00
By:TimesTabloid

As conversations around blockchain infrastructure continue to evolve, confusion often arises over the different roles of major networks and digital assets.

Crypto commentator Eri (@sentosumosaba) has highlighted a detailed thread from Yellow Chairman Alexis Sirkia that seeks to distinguish the functions of Ripple, XRP, Linea, and Hyperledger while explaining why he remains optimistic about both XRP and Linea.

Sharing the thread on X, Eri pointed followers to Sirkia’s explanation, emphasizing one of its central arguments: Ripple and XRP focus on providing liquidity infrastructure, as SWIFT’s emerging use of Linea technology centers on moving tokenized assets issued by banks themselves. Eri encouraged readers to review the full thread to understand the relationship between these technologies rather than viewing them as direct competitors.

The @Yellow Chairman @AlexisYellow, (bullish on both XRP & Linea) tries to clear up confusion in a🧵about Hylerledger / Linux Foundation / Linea / XRP worlds.

👉 "@Ripple or XRP are not in the business of tokenizing bank assets; they are in the business of infrastructure to move… pic.twitter.com/jw3gDuM7jq

— 🌸Eri ~ Carpe Diem (@sentosumosaba) July 10, 2026

Sirkia Explains the Development of Linea

Sirkia began by outlining Hyperledger’s origins, noting that the Linux Foundation established it. He explained that Hyperledger Fabric was largely contributed by IBM in 2015, while Consensys developed Hyperledger Besu and donated it to the Hyperledger Foundation, now known as the Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust. According to Sirkia, Consensys continues to serve as the primary maintainer of Besu.

He stated that Linea was built on top of Hyperledger Besu and argued that although the Linux Foundation originally intended Hyperledger to remain a framework without its own cryptocurrency, permissionless blockchain networks ultimately required native digital assets. He suggested that this evolution led to the development of Linea.

Why Sirkia Believes SWIFT Chose Linea

The thread also addressed SWIFT’s reported use of Linea technology. Sirkia claimed that SWIFT built its first private permissioned test ledger using the complete Linea technology stack rather than relying solely on Hyperledger Besu. He said this implementation included zero-knowledge privacy technology, high transaction throughput, and advanced state management capabilities.

According to Sirkia, Linea’s selective disclosure model was a major factor behind its appeal. He explained that the technology allows authorized parties, such as regulators or central banks, to access transaction details through viewing keys while keeping sensitive financial information hidden from competitors and the public. He added that this balance between privacy and regulatory oversight aligns with ideas promoted by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in his research on privacy-preserving blockchain systems.

We are on X, follow us to connect with us :-

— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025

Ripple and XRP Fill a Different Role

A major focus of the thread was the distinction between Ripple’s business model and SWIFT’s reported use of Linea technology. Sirkia argued that the two solutions address different financial needs rather than competing directly.

He stated that Ripple and XRP are designed to provide liquidity infrastructure for cross-border payments, particularly in corridors where moving money efficiently remains difficult. In contrast, he said SWIFT’s use of Linea technology is intended to facilitate the movement of tokenized assets issued by banks themselves.

Sirkia concluded by disclosing that he holds significant positions in both Linea and XRP. While expressing confidence in the long-term potential of both ecosystems, he said investors should understand that each serves a distinct purpose within the evolving financial infrastructure rather than expecting one to replace the other.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?

The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?