Robinhood Chain sees ETH surge 5x as stablecoins climb to $260M
Robinhood Chain, the company’s freshly minted Ethereum Layer-2 network, is already showing signs of explosive early adoption. ETH holdings on the chain have surged roughly fivefold since launch, while stablecoins circulating on the network have ballooned to approximately $260 million. Bitcoin, for what it’s worth, hasn’t budged on the platform.
The numbers behind the early momentum
Robinhood Chain went live on July 1, 2026, during a London event, built on Arbitrum Orbit technology as a permissionless, AI-native chain. Within a week, things got interesting fast.
By July 8, Uniswap trading volume on the chain crossed $500 million in a single 24-hour period.
The stablecoin supply tells an equally compelling story. Shortly after launch, stablecoins on the chain hit roughly $247 million, with the Paxos-issued USDG accounting for about $212 million of that total. The figure has since climbed to the $260 million range.
Bitcoin remained flat on the platform, suggesting that early users are focused on DeFi activity, tokenized assets, and memecoins rather than simply parking BTC.
What Robinhood actually built
Robinhood Chain is specifically designed around the tokenization of real-world assets, or RWAs. The network supports stock tokens for companies like Nvidia, Google, and Apple, traded on-chain alongside native crypto assets.
Chainlink integration was baked in from day one, providing oracle data feeds and cross-chain interoperability through its CCIP protocol. Partners like Uniswap and Pleiades are already contributing liquidity to the ecosystem.
Before any of this went public, the testnet had processed over 200 million transactions.
Why this matters for investors
The dominance of USDG, a Paxos-issued stablecoin, is notable. Paxos has a track record of regulatory compliance and institutional credibility, which could make Robinhood Chain more palatable to traditional finance players.
Coinbase has Base. Now Robinhood has its own chain. Major US brokerages and exchanges are no longer content to just list tokens — they want to own the infrastructure layer.
The $500 million Uniswap volume day was driven largely by memecoins and tokenized assets, and memecoin volume is notoriously spiky. If Robinhood Chain can retain liquidity and build consistent daily volumes in tokenized RWAs, it could carve out a genuinely differentiated niche.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

