Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Cantor Fitzgerald says Strategy’s top priority is restoring STRC preferred stock to par value

Cantor Fitzgerald says Strategy’s top priority is restoring STRC preferred stock to par value

CryptobriefingCryptobriefing2026/07/08 12:06
By:Cryptobriefing

Strategy Inc., the company formerly known as MicroStrategy that has become synonymous with corporate Bitcoin accumulation, has a problem. Its perpetual preferred stock, STRC, is trading well below its $100 par value, and that’s gumming up the entire capital engine that powers its Bitcoin buying spree.

Cantor Fitzgerald analysts say fixing that is job number one. And they think investors should position accordingly, recommending either STRC at its current discount or MSTR common shares.

The STRC problem, explained

When STRC trades at par, the company can use it to raise capital cheaply and efficiently. When it trades below par, as it currently does between roughly $86 and $88, the whole system stalls.

Strategy can’t issue new preferred shares at attractive terms when the existing ones are trading at a 12-14% discount to face value. Nobody wants to buy new stock at $100 when the market is pricing the old stock in the mid-$80s.

Advertisement
window.sevioads = window.sevioads || []; var sevioads_preferences = []; sevioads_preferences[0] = {}; sevioads_preferences[0].zone = "de1434f5-fa9e-44a6-93c3-4c2439763717"; sevioads_preferences[0].adType = "banner"; sevioads_preferences[0].inventoryId = "c5700508-581b-472c-8fdd-a931cdbfc8e1"; sevioads_preferences[0].accountId = "1e47efc1-ec2d-4fca-a8b9-354e249e5095"; sevioads.push(sevioads_preferences);

STRC carries a variable annual dividend of 12%, adjusted monthly. Strategy has reportedly sold $216 million worth of Bitcoin in at least one instance specifically to keep those dividend payments flowing.

Why Cantor says to buy

For income-oriented investors, STRC at current levels offers that 12% variable dividend plus potential price appreciation if the stock recovers to its $100 par value. Buying at $87 and collecting 12% annually while waiting for a roughly 15% capital gain is, on paper, a pretty compelling setup.

For those with more conviction in Strategy’s broader Bitcoin thesis, Cantor points to MSTR common shares. The logic here is structural: once STRC gets restored to par, Strategy’s entire capital-raising apparatus comes back online.

Cantor’s analysts frame the preferred shares not as competition against common shareholders but as essential financing tools. The firm anticipates that Strategy will build cash reserves specifically to fund ongoing dividend payments, taking whatever measures are necessary to push STRC back to par. That includes, apparently, selling Bitcoin when needed.

The Bitcoin selling paradox

Strategy has historically used securities like STRC to finance Bitcoin accumulation. The playbook is straightforward: issue preferred stock, use the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, and let the appreciating Bitcoin holdings support the overall enterprise value.

The current situation inverts that playbook. Instead of using preferred stock to buy Bitcoin, Strategy is selling Bitcoin to support the preferred stock. The $216 million Bitcoin sale to sustain dividends establishes a precedent that Bitcoin is not, in fact, a one-way accumulation asset on the balance sheet — it’s a resource that can and will be deployed to manage capital structure obligations.

What this means for investors

If Strategy successfully restores the preferred stock to par, it unlocks lower-cost capital raises and reignites Bitcoin purchasing activity. If STRC continues to languish below par, expect more Bitcoin liquidations to fund dividends.

For MSTR common shareholders, the stock’s premium over its net asset value has historically been justified by the company’s ability to raise capital and buy more Bitcoin. Without a functioning preferred stock market, that justification weakens considerably. Cantor’s buy recommendation implicitly assumes the STRC recovery will succeed, which is worth noting as a key risk factor in the thesis.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?

The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?