Nvidia challenges Intel and AMD in $200B CPU market
Nvidia has engaged itself in entering the market for data center CPUs, a domain that was previously dominated by companies like Intel and AMD and is currently valued at $200 billion. The company has already acquired its first customer in the form of Perplexity, which will be among the first companies to adopt Nvidia’s new processor, Vera. This is a major move aimed at stretching the capabilities of Nvidia’s operations beyond its renowned GPUs.
The reasons at stake are mostly economic. Nvidia’s claim, which was published in Ian Buck’s corporate blog post on July 7, is about the fact that the processor that handles the operation of an AI model – running various applications, executing code, transferring data, etc. – is currently a bottleneck that causes expensive GPUs to remain idle while their processing power goes underutilized. In addition, it was mentioned by Reuters that
Perplexity is going to implement Vera as one of the first projects of Nvidia’s new CPU platform. VP Nate Kupp had stated that the processor was found to be “a dead-on fit” for the company’s needs and made its functions 1.5 times faster than those of traditional CPUs during internal tests. While Reuters reported the decision to adopt Vera and the benchmark mentioned above, it should be noted that the tests were conducted by Perplexity and Nvidia, not by any independent authorities.
Perplexity ran one of its everyday agent jobs on the chip, cloning a code repository and running its test suite inside isolated sandboxes. According to Nvidia, Vera finished that work roughly 1.5 times faster than a comparable x86 server processor and spun up parallel sandboxes as much as 1.9 times faster. The AI search company now plans to incorporate Vera into its next production system.
Why the CPU became the bottleneck
The reason why the CPU has become the bottleneck in AI technology relates back to the functioning pattern of AI agents. Unlike traditional chatbots which only focus on generating responses, AI agents are responsible for the execution of tools, code running, performing queries, document retrieval, and evaluation of results before making any further moves. The process is sequential, and therefore the performance of a single-threaded CPU becomes essential for timely execution of the responses.
The AI industry is paying more and more attention to this change. With artificial intelligence transitioning from text production to carrying out complicated multiple functions by itself, it has become necessary for CPUs to do orchestration, manipulation, and transfer of information before the GPU makes any inference.
According to Nvidia, in order to make maximum use of GPUs, much faster CPUs would be required at a data center where thousands of artificial intelligence agents are needed to work simultaneously. Similarly, traditional processors were developed long before the technology involving always-on AI agents appeared, creating an opportunity for CPUs optimized specifically for these workloads.
A direct shot at Intel and AMD
Nvidia is not hiding its intentions either. During Computex on June 2 in Taipei, Jensen Huang, the company’s CEO, indicated that the establishment of a computer and server CPU division is part of their plans to “reinvent” the CPU market. Many experts in the field agree that such an initiative places Nvidia in the category of competitors to Intel and AMD. According to Reuters, Nvidia is anticipated to make $20 billion with its Vera CPUs in the current fiscal year. At the same time, the company claims that the total CPU potential is worth $200 billion.
This hope for a competitive position comes as Nvidia wants to find itself not only in the area of AI accelerators but also outside this limited area. The global server CPU market has historically been served by Intel and AMD with the help of x86 processors. However, Arm-based processors have found their way into the market of hyperscale cloud computing, where companies make some optimizations for specific workloads instead of having to use some general-purpose processors.
This competition comes while the incumbents are struggling. Nvidia stock closed at $196.93 on July 7, which was up 0.7%, according to data from Yahoo Finance. AMD and Intel declined by 6.5% and 9.7%, respectively. But analysts have generally attributed those declines to a wider semiconductor sell-off over Samsung-related news rather than solely on Nvidia’s Vera.
Nvidia says it is not done. Its next server core, Rigel, based on Arm v9.2 and planned for the future Rosa platform, is intended to further increase per-core performance. Whether Vera manages to revolutionize the server CPU landscape or not will be determined not just by Nvidia’s own performance measurements, but also by the actual reception from clients and third-party verification of Vera’s performance through various pilot tests.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

