AI Is Reaching Into the Bond Market—Is a Prelude to 2008 Unfolding?
Over the past two years, the most prominent area for AI has been the stock market, with the valuations of leading AI-related companies being driven higher and higher.
The more important change now is: AI is turning massively to debt. The five major hyperscalers—Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle—have issued $121 billion in US corporate bonds in 2025, while the annual average from 2020 to 2024 was only $28 billion. The forecast for new debt issuance by the Big Five in 2026 has been raised to $175 billion. Global AI-related debt issuance may approach $570 billion in 2026.
This is because training and running AI is not just writing a few lines of code; it requires extremely expensive real-world infrastructure: chips, servers, data centers, land, electricity, cooling systems, fiber optics, and long-term leases. In other words, AI has long since shifted from a “light asset, software story” to a “heavy asset, infrastructure story.”
This is where the bond market comes in to foot the bill, as capital from the equities market alone is no longer sufficient.
According to the latest reports, Amazon is planning to issue at least $25 billion in bonds for AI-related capital expenditures and debt repayment.
Despite so many AI-related bonds being issued now, corporate bond spreads have not skyrocketed immediately.
The reason is simple: many of the biggest issuers are “super blue chips”—Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta. These companies have strong cash flows, high profits, and excellent credit ratings. Bond investors think: even if some AI investments are wasteful, it’s unlikely that these companies couldn’t pay back their debts.
This is also why the market looks very calm now. Spreads for many investment-grade bonds remain very low, meaning investors have not yet asked these companies to pay significantly higher extra interest.
But this is precisely one of the hidden risks. Financial crises often do not start with assets that “everyone knows are hazardous,” but with those that “everyone assumes are perfectly safe.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

