Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Strategist: Gold Shows Bottoming Signals, Divergence Emerges Between Gold and Silver

Strategist: Gold Shows Bottoming Signals, Divergence Emerges Between Gold and Silver

新浪财经新浪财经2026/07/07 03:06
Show original
By:新浪财经

Strategist: Gold Shows Bottoming Signals, Divergence Emerges Between Gold and Silver image 0

  

Source: Huitong Finance

  The international gold price continues to be blocked by the key $4,200 resistance level, pulling back sharply from the high at the beginning of the year. However, Saxo Bank’s Head of Commodity Strategy Ole Hansen has put forward a new judgment: the most severe phase of the months-long concentrated selling has ended, and the gold market has shifted from passive liquidation to a period of bottom consolidation.

A weakening US employment report, combined with dovish signals from Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh regarding inflation moderation, have lowered market expectations for rate hikes, providing macro support for precious metals. While both gold and silver are simultaneously entering a recovery window, their market size and supply-demand structure differ significantly, leading to obvious differentiation in their rebound timing and volatility. Short-term technical resistance will still limit upside potential.

  Macro expectations turning dovish, Federal Reserve policy outlook reshaping the pricing logic of precious metals

  Gold price performance remains anchored to expectations of US monetary policy. Previously, the market largely bet on Fed rate hikes this year. However, June’s weak jobs data—with only 57,000 new positions added—significantly eroded expectations of aggressive tightening.

  Fed Chair Warsh publicly reiterated commitment to price stability while admitting that in recent weeks, inflation risks have clearly moderated, further weakening the necessity for rate hikes.

  According to Hansen, forward inflation expectations have fallen sharply and energy prices are also declining, leaving no rational logic for continued rate hikes. Once the market reaches consensus, long-accumulated dollar long positions will unwind en masse, causing the US dollar to weaken and short-term US Treasury yields to fall—benefiting non-yielding assets like gold from the opportunity cost perspective. However, before the Fed’s policy path becomes fully clear, gold’s recovery faces many obstacles, with the current price still down 26% from the January high.

  Gold enters a bottom-building stage, multiple technical resistances restrict rebound height

  Support near $4,000 has temporarily held, but when gold rebounded to the $4,200 level on Monday it faced renewed selling pressure, with many investors using the bounce to reduce positions. This is a typical repair feature after a deep correction and implies the market needs ample time to build a solid bottom.

  From a technical point of view, the 200-day moving average near $4,485 is the first major resistance, while the 38.2% retracement of the January to June decline is at $4,574. Only if gold effectively breaks through these two critical levels will the technical structure fully turn bullish. At the current stage, this recovery should only be defined as bottom-building. Fund flows are showing clear changes, as market operations shift from panic exits to selectively buying on dips. The outlook now depends entirely on whether the broader macro environment continues to signal dovishness.

  Silver stabilizes and rebounds in tandem, with supply-demand advantages and high volatility characteristics presenting a dual attribute

  Hansen is also optimistic about the near-term outlook for silver. On Monday, silver’s rally stalled at $63.27 per ounce, but in the previous sharp drop, strong support at the $55 level held and the price recovered above $60, sending a positive recovery signal.

  

Silver combines gold’s macro interest rate sensitivity with unique physical supply-demand logic. A persistent supply deficit, coupled with steadily growing industrial demand, underpins its long-term fundamentals. However, the silver market is far smaller than that of gold, making its price more easily affected by short-term capital flows. During market recoveries, trend-following funds will quickly enter and drive gains, while sentiment reversals will lead to more intense concentrated sell-offs,
making it a highly elastic, high-volatility precious metal variety
.

  The sharp declines in recent months have significantly damaged silver’s technical structure and market confidence, and the recovery period required will be longer than for gold.

  Summary

  Considering macro policy, capital behavior, and technical patterns, concentrated selling pressure on precious metals has largely been cleared, with gold officially entering a bottom-building phase while silver simultaneously starts a stabilization and recovery window. Weaker US inflation and employment data are gradually dispelling the bearish impact of Fed rate hikes. However, gold faces multiple layers of technical resistance that are unlikely to be quickly breached in the short term; silver, while enjoying long-term value driven by industrial supply-demand, also carries the risk of severe volatility impacting trades.

  Subsequent statements from the Fed, US Treasury yields, and dollar trends will directly determine how long the bottoming period and the rebound space for gold and silver last.

  

Spot Gold
Daily Chart Source: Yihuitong
GMT+8 July 7, 10:41 (UTC+8)
Spot Gold
quoted at $4,142.59/oz.

Editor: Zhu Hennan

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?

The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?