ENS delegate warns Foundation proposal marks project’s downfall
A prominent ENS delegate is sounding the alarm over a governance proposal that would hand significant operational control to the ENS Foundation, calling it the beginning of the end for the Ethereum Name Service as a truly decentralized project.
Alex Netto, an ENS delegate since 2022 and founder of Blockful, claims the proposal “sets the start of ENS’s downfall.” It’s the kind of statement that tends to get attention in governance circles, and in this case, it’s sparking a broader debate about how much centralization is too much for a project built on Ethereum’s decentralization-first ethos.
What the proposal actually does
The proposal, titled “[Temp Check] Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation,” was posted on June 19 on the ENS DAO governance forum by the ENS Foundation and Labs leadership group. At its core, the initiative would transfer authority over day-to-day operations, grant programs, and treasury and endowment strategy from the DAO to the Foundation.
ENS token holders would still maintain sole power over two things: appointing Foundation directors and setting protocol parameters. Everything else, the actual running of the organization, would shift to the Foundation.
The proposal’s authors have drawn parallels to successful nonprofit governance models from the web2 world, pointing to organizations like Mozilla and Signal as templates. The argument goes something like this: DAOs are great in theory, but in practice they suffer from delegate fatigue, lack of accountability, and decision-making paralysis. A more structured Foundation could solve those problems.
Why Netto thinks this is a mistake
Netto isn’t some random voice in the ENS ecosystem. He’s been a delegate since 2022 and his project, Blockful, created the ENS Security Council. His core concern appears to center on the concentration of operational power. When a Foundation controls budgets, grants, and treasury strategy, the meaningful decisions about resource allocation happen at the Foundation level, not at the token holder level. Retaining the right to appoint directors and set protocol parameters sounds significant until you realize those are relatively infrequent decisions compared to the daily grind of operational governance.
Netto has also previously flagged what he described as a $150 million exposure risk within ENS governance, suggesting a pattern of concerns about how the project manages its resources and accountability structures.
The broader governance fight
This isn’t happening in a vacuum. Alongside the Foundation empowerment proposal, there are active discussions about creating an alternative structure called an “Independent ENS Foundation for Accountability.” The existence of a competing proposal suggests that even people who agree the current DAO structure needs reform don’t necessarily agree on what reform should look like.
What this means for ENS holders
For anyone holding ENS tokens, this governance battle is worth watching closely. The outcome will fundamentally shape what ENS token ownership actually means going forward.
If the Foundation proposal passes, ENS tokens become something closer to shares in a nonprofit with limited shareholder rights. You get to vote on directors and protocol rules, but the Foundation handles everything else. If the proposal fails or gets significantly modified, the DAO retains broader control but continues dealing with the structural challenges that prompted this proposal in the first place.
Investors should pay particular attention to how this temp check vote plays out and what modifications the community demands. The details of accountability mechanisms, transparency requirements, and recall provisions will matter far more than the headline framing of the proposal.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.
Crypto prices
More
