Jeff Sprecher calls Hyperliquid bigger than NASDAQ, run by 11 people
The guy who owns the New York Stock Exchange just told a room full of institutional investors that a decentralized crypto exchange with 11 employees is bigger than NASDAQ.
Jeff Sprecher, CEO of Intercontinental Exchange, made the comment during the Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference on May 27. His exact words, delivered with the casual confidence of someone who’s been watching this space closely: “This Hyperliquid that we’re talking, if you haven’t heard about it, it’s bigger than NASDAQ, okay? It’s 11 people.”
The numbers behind the flex
Hyperliquid has carved out a dominant market share in decentralized perpetual futures trading, generating an estimated $650 million in annualized protocol revenue.
As of late May, Hyperliquid is processing roughly $9.5 billion in open interest.
The platform runs on its own custom Layer-1 blockchain, split into two components: HyperCore and HyperEVM. At its center sits a fully on-chain central limit order book, which is the same type of matching engine that traditional exchanges use, except this one lives entirely on a blockchain.
The HYPE token, which launched via an airdrop in 2024 and serves as the protocol’s governance and incentivization mechanism, recently hit record prices above $62, pushing its market cap into the $13 billion to $15 billion range in late May.
Revenue from trading fees is being channeled into buybacks and treasury operations.
Beyond crypto: S&P 500 perps and prediction markets
Hyperliquid recently launched S&P 500 perpetual futures contracts, allowing traders to get leveraged exposure to the benchmark US equity index on-chain, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It has also moved into prediction markets. By offering these alongside its core perpetuals product, Hyperliquid is positioning itself as a general-purpose trading venue that happens to run on a blockchain.
Why traditional finance is paying attention
Sprecher runs ICE, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange. When someone in that position name-drops a DeFi protocol at a major institutional conference, it signals something meaningful about where the conversation is heading.
Hyperliquid represents a public, permissionless trading venue that is generating real revenue and processing real volume, with a team so small it borders on absurd.
Hyperliquid has faced scrutiny over centralization concerns, given its small team and validator set. A platform handling $9.5 billion in open interest with 11 operators is either an incredible feat of engineering or a single point of failure waiting to be tested.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.
Crypto prices
More
