Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
SUI mainnet resumes normal operations after validator fix

SUI mainnet resumes normal operations after validator fix

CryptobriefingCryptobriefing2026/06/24 01:45
By:Cryptobriefing

The Sui mainnet is back online after a bug in its latest software release brought the network to a standstill for roughly 5 hours and 55 minutes. Validators coordinated a fix and upgraded to a patched version, restoring normal checkpoint production on May 29.

The culprit was a flaw in the gas charging logic introduced in Sui’s 1.72 release. In English: the code that calculates how much users pay for transactions broke, and the entire network stopped processing new blocks as a result.

What happened and how it got fixed

The outage began on May 28, when validators running the 1.72 update encountered the bug and stopped producing new checkpoints. No new transactions could be finalized, which effectively froze the network in place.

Recovery wasn’t as simple as flipping a switch. Sui’s consensus mechanism required validators holding more than two-thirds of all staked tokens to upgrade to the patched software before the chain could resume.

Advertisement
window.sevioads = window.sevioads || []; var sevioads_preferences = []; sevioads_preferences[0] = {}; sevioads_preferences[0].zone = "de1434f5-fa9e-44a6-93c3-4c2439763717"; sevioads_preferences[0].adType = "banner"; sevioads_preferences[0].inventoryId = "c5700508-581b-472c-8fdd-a931cdbfc8e1"; sevioads_preferences[0].accountId = "1e47efc1-ec2d-4fca-a8b9-354e249e5095"; sevioads.push(sevioads_preferences);

Sui’s safety guarantees held up. No user funds were lost during the disruption, and the network’s design prevented any data inconsistencies from creeping in while the chain was stalled.

DeFi protocols built on Sui were effectively frozen during the outage. Positions couldn’t be adjusted, trades couldn’t execute, and liquidations couldn’t fire.

A pattern emerging

This wasn’t Sui’s first rodeo with extended downtime in 2026. Back on January 14, the network experienced a similar multi-hour stall lasting approximately 6 hours, that time caused by a consensus commit bug.

Two outages of this magnitude in roughly five months is a trend that’s hard to ignore. Both incidents shared a similar profile: a bug introduced in a software update, followed by a multi-hour scramble to coordinate validator upgrades across the network.

The SUI token reflected investor sentiment in real time. During the outage, the price dropped to approximately $0.89, a decline in the range of 6-8%. It partially recovered after normal operations resumed.

What this means for investors

Sui has positioned itself as a high-throughput Layer 1 blockchain, the kind of infrastructure that’s supposed to support demanding DeFi applications and eventually attract institutional capital. The total value locked across Sui’s ecosystem has grown to hundreds of millions of dollars since the network launched.

For traders, the 6-8% price decline during the outage and partial recovery afterward suggests a playbook the market may repeat if a third incident occurs.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:56
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.

The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:46

After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

智通财经•2026/11/12 03:42
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%

For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

智通财经•2026/11/12 02:47
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%