New Senate housing bill may put a four-year brake on a U.S. digital dollar
Lawmakers have advanced the digital dollar debate into legislation by adding a four-year prohibition on CBDCs to a Senate-passed housing affordability package, despite no active plans for a U.S. virtual currency.
According to legislative summaries and committee releases, the bill would prevent the Federal Reserve from issuing, creating, or indirectly distributing any central bank digital currency “widely available to the general public” until at least December 31, 2030.
Seeking to prevent the U.S. from replicating European and Chinese CBDC frameworks, GOP politicians have mobilized against the concept, branding it an intrusive tool for state surveillance.
They successfully advocated for its inclusion in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which secured overwhelming passage in the Senate Monday night by an 85-5 margin.
Should the House of Representatives vote in favor of the bill and President Donald Trump later approve it, the CBDC provision will be written into federal law.
The CBDC ban would only be temporary if the bill is signed into law
Earlier in January, President Donald Trump had also formally directed his administration not to pursue a CBDC, arguing that it could jeopardize privacy rights and the stability of the U.S. financial system.
Trump’s allies in Congress successfully added an amendment to an unrelated housing package that legally bars the Federal Reserve System from creating a CBDC or any similar digital asset via financial intermediaries. Even if approved, the CBDC ban would remain in effect only until the close of 2030.
The Federal Reserve has maintained that a U.S. digital currency remains in its theoretical research phase, in contrast to Europe and China, where development of these government-backed digital assets is much further along.
Europe is already preparing to test a digital euro next year, ahead of a full launch in 2029, while China has been developing its own digital yuan under the People’s Bank of China.
Before stepping down, former Fed Chair Jerome Powell noted that a digital dollar would be issued by private banks, pushing back against Republican fears of a government financial dictatorship. The new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, however, stated during his nomination hearing that he does not support a U.S. CBDC, characterizing it as a “bad policy choice.”
Lawmakers in the House are also reportedly looking to accelerate consideration of the housing bill and could approve it as early as Tuesday. If Trump signs it, the CBDC provision would be enacted along with the rest of the legislation.
South Korea and Europe are advancing their CBDC projects
South Korea has been pursuing a CBDC. The Bank of Korea has advanced its central bank digital currency pilot to a second phase focused on integrating deposit tokens into established banking frameworks, moving beyond initial retail-level testing.
It will have participating banks enhance their core banking operations with e-wallets, voucher tools, and blockchain technology that can work alongside existing payment and settlement networks.
Authorities want to test whether central bank-guided digital tokens can process payments and settlements while remaining part of the formal banking infrastructure.
This development pushes the project beyond theoretical testing and toward real-world application. Banks are expected to assess how tokenized funds interact with core banking functions and regulatory controls.
Meanwhile, in February, the European Parliament gave the green light to the Digital Euro, saying it is absolutely necessary to boost monetary independence and smooth retail payments across the region.
The ECB spent March and April doing the heavy technical lifting for both the Digital Euro and the systems that will handle tokenized cash in Europe. It’s moved beyond the design phase and is now focused on implementation planning, though the digital euro’s launch ultimately hinges on new legislation.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

