Bullish climbs to number two globally for BTC options by open interest, eyes massive growth ahead
Bullish Exchange, which launched its Bitcoin options product in October 2025, has already muscled its way past OKX, Binance, and CME to claim the second-largest share of global BTC options open interest.
By the end of January 2026, Bullish had accumulated $4 billion in open interest. By April, that figure had ballooned past $6 billion, putting the exchange firmly behind only Deribit. The exchange also reported options trading volumes exceeding $9 billion across Q4 2025 and early 2026.
A market in transition
In mid-January 2026, Bitcoin options open interest peaked at nearly $74 billion, actually surpassing futures open interest, which sat around $65 billion at the time.
The concentration of Bitcoin options activity at those $80K to $95K strike prices underscores hedging behavior among institutional investors. When Bitcoin is swinging between $80K and $95K, as it was in late 2025 and early 2026, the ability to buy downside protection without selling your spot position is enormously valuable.
Bullish’s strategic positioning
Bullish trades publicly under the ticker BLSH and is a sister company to CoinDesk. Being a public company means quarterly disclosures, regulatory scrutiny, and the kind of institutional credibility that hedge funds and asset managers tend to require before onboarding.
Bullish went from zero to $3 billion in open interest by mid-January 2026, then added another billion by month’s end. The trajectory from $4 billion to $6 billion by April suggests the growth rate hasn’t plateaued.
What this means for investors
Crypto options volume is still dramatically lower than what you’d see in traditional finance. Equity options in the US alone dwarf the entire crypto derivatives market by orders of magnitude.
The risk is concentration. With Deribit still dominating and Bullish rapidly consolidating the number two position, the Bitcoin options market is not exactly a model of decentralization. If either platform experienced a significant technical failure or regulatory challenge, the ripple effects could be substantial.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

