Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Game Designer to XRP Holders: Why DTCC Can Move Forward With or Without CLARITY Act

Game Designer to XRP Holders: Why DTCC Can Move Forward With or Without CLARITY Act

TimesTabloidTimesTabloid2026/06/22 06:03
By:TimesTabloid

Chad Steingraber, a game designer and well-known figure in the crypto space, has shared an SEC letter about a question that’s been circulating in XRP communities for some time.

A community member asked Steingraber whether DTCC’s tokenization timeline depends on the CLARITY Act passing. He noted that XRP looks well-positioned to benefit from any delays tied to the legislation. Steingraber’s answer left no room for ambiguity. He revealed that the DTCC is permitted by the SEC to move forward.

He followed up with a post explaining exactly where that permission comes from, attaching an image of an SEC document dated December 11, 2025.

This is the reason the DTCC can move forward with or without the Clarity Act. The SEC has specifically told them that "No Action" will be taken against them as they proceed to launch of their tokenization platform.

— Chad Steingraber (@ChadSteingraber) June 20, 2026

The SEC’s No-action Letter

The document is a no-action letter from the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets. It’s addressed to Brian Steele, Managing Director and President of Clearing & Securities Services at DTCC, and Nadine Chakar, Managing Director and Global Head of DTCC Digital Assets.

The letter responds to a request DTC submitted that same day. DTC asked the SEC staff not to recommend enforcement action against it under certain provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, specifically so it could launch the pilot version of its tokenization program.

The request addresses multiple regulatory areas, covering system reliability standards, rule-filing procedures, and clearing agency requirements.

Why This Matters for the DTCC’s Timeline

The letter is from December 2025, about seven months before DTCC’s planned July 2026 launch window. With June already underway, that clearance isn’t some distant promise. It’s already in hand, and the launch is weeks away. DTCC requested permission, and the SEC granted it via this no-action position.

The DTCC doesn’t need the CLARITY Act to proceed. It already has a regulatory green light from the SEC itself, in writing, tied directly to the tokenization platform it’s building.

What This Means for XRP Holders

For XRP holders watching the CLARITY Act’s progress through Congress, Steingraber’s post draws a clear line between two separate processes. Legislative action on crypto market structure is one track. DTCC’s tokenization rollout is another, and it’s running on SEC-issued authorization that predates the current legislative debate.

Ripple Prime’s seat in DTCC’s Industry Working Group means Ripple has visibility into this rollout regardless of how or when CLARITY Act discussions conclude. Steingraber lays out a straightforward case showing that DTCC’s path to launch doesn’t run through Congress, and offers XRP another path to widespread institutional use.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:56
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.

The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:46

After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

智通财经•2026/11/12 03:42
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%

For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

智通财经•2026/11/12 02:47
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%