Here’s What Ripple Is Doing to Protect XRP From Quantum Threats
According to a recent report from BSC News, RippleX chief engineer Ayo Akinyele is leading a major security overhaul of the XRP Ledger. The upgrade prepares the network for two converging risks: quantum computing and the rise of an AI-driven economy.
The plan includes hybrid signature technology, and the system can switch to stronger cryptographic protections if needed. Akinyele confirmed the initiative has been in development since 2024, well before quantum risk became a mainstream topic about crypto.
Ripple Races To Protect XRP From Quantum Threats
RippleX chief engineer Ayo Akinyele says $XRP Ledger is being upgraded to prepare for quantum computing risks and the emerging AI economy.
The plan includes hybrid signature technology that can switch to stronger protections if…
— BSCN (@BSCNews) June 18, 2026
A Switch, Not an Overhaul
The hybrid model is the core of the strategy. XRPL runs standard cryptography under normal conditions. If a credible quantum threat emerges, the network can shift to quantum-resistant signatures without a disruptive hard fork. This keeps current performance intact while giving Ripple a built-in contingency.
AI agents are increasingly expected to transact independently, sending payments for things like data access or compute resources. A ledger built to handle both quantum risk and machine-driven transaction volume positions XRPL for a different kind of user base than crypto networks have served before.
The Institutional Pitch
Ripple executives have been clear about the business case behind the upgrade. The stated goal is to bring major financial institutions onto the network. Banks and large payment providers need assurance that the infrastructure they build on won’t face an existential security gap years down the line. A credible, tested quantum defense removes that uncertainty and turns the upgrade into a selling point for institutional adoption.
XRP’s Quantum Readiness
An XRPL validator published an analysis in April examining quantum exposure across major blockchains. The analysis found that just 0.03% of circulating XRP carries quantum risk. Bitcoin’s exposure, by contrast, sits between 32% and 35% of its total supply.
The difference comes down to network design. Bitcoin uses a UTXO model, in which public keys can become visible in transaction data under certain conditions. Early pay-to-public-key outputs left keys permanently exposed.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :-
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
XRPL’s account-based model works differently. Public keys only become visible after a wallet sends its first signed transaction, which limits exposure by default. Bitcoin also has no native key rotation.
What’s Next for XRP?
Ripple has staged the rollout in phases. Testing of quantum-resistant algorithms continues through 2026, with Ripple working alongside research firm Project Eleven on validator benchmarks and an early custody wallet prototype. A native amendment bringing full quantum resistance into XRPL’s core design is targeted for 2028.
Akinyele has emphasized that this work started in 2024, ahead of the recent wave of quantum research that pushed the topic into broader crypto conversation. 2026 testing will show whether the hybrid model holds up under real network conditions.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.
Crypto prices
More
