Franklin Templeton files for ETFs that reinvest stock dividends into bitcoin
Asset manager Franklin Templeton has filed for two new exchange-traded funds that would reinvest stock dividends into bitcoin.
The firm's Thursday filing shows that Franklin is registering two ETFs — Franklin US Equity Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF and Franklin US Innovation Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF — with an expected effective date as early as Sept. 1, 2026.
The funds are designed to track the VettaFi US Large-Cap 500 Bitcoin DRIP Index and a related innovation variant. Under the mechanism, dividends from the underlying equity holdings would be systematically reinvested in bitcoin. Bitcoin exposure would be achieved through bitcoin exchange-traded products, futures, options, or other instruments, per the filing.
Specifically, the index is designed to launch with a 95% allocation to U.S. large-cap equities and a 5% allocation to bitcoin. During quarterly rebalances, bitcoin exposure above 5% would be reduced to 4.5%, while an overall cap of 20% would apply between rebalances, according to the filing.
As of April 30, the equity index held approximately 498 securities, with market caps ranging from $7.5 billion to $4.9 trillion, per the filing.
The filing is the latest move in Franklin's broader crypto push. Its spot bitcoin ETF (EZBC) held $358.9 million in net assets and recorded $329.6 million in cumulative net inflows as of Thursday.
In May, Franklin Templeton entered into a partnership with Payward, the parent company of crypto exchange Kraken, to explore new ways to tokenize traditional investment products.
Earlier this month, Franklin said it is integrating its BENJI tokenized money market fund and other tokenized products into MoonPay Trade, allowing institutional users to swap between stablecoins like USDC and USDT and Franklin's tokenized fund via MoonPay's onchain trading infrastructure.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

