Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
At 2:00 AM, an era quietly came to an end.

At 2:00 AM, an era quietly came to an end.

金融界金融界2026/06/18 00:11
Show original
By:金融界

Source: Wall Street Intelligence Circle

The World Remembers Walsh

At 2:00 AM in the UTC+8 time zone, the Federal Reserve announced interest rates would remain unchanged, but nonetheless shocked the world.

The dot plot hinted at a possible rate hike before the end of this year, and the policy statement removed the previous phrasing that “suggested a potential rate cut.” As a result, US stocks, gold, and bitcoin fell sharply, while the US dollar index surged.

But for professionals on Wall Street, the above was predictable; the real shock came in the following three points:

First, Walsh undertook drastic cuts to the policy statement, reducing it to just three paragraphs—less than half the word count—returning to the format used in the Greenspan era. The first time opening the Fed news release, people thought they had clicked the wrong link. Now, except for a factual summary of the economic situation, the statement offers almost no guidance.

This marks the beginning of the new Fed Chair Walsh’s changes—he did not first change the market, but started by changing the Fed itself, with the goal of ultimately shifting the market. Walsh announced a new era: the era of Powell’s “transparent Fed” has ended, and the era of Walsh’s “opaque Fed” has begun. In the future, market volatility is likely to rise significantly. Investors can no longer, as in past years, predict the direction in advance by scrutinizing every word from the Fed.

During Powell’s era, markets loved analyzing the Fed’s every statement—a single sentence could be dissected for three days, a punctuation mark could be debated for a week. But Walsh won’t do this anymore; the market must now interpret on its own, discover prices independently, and bear risks itself. In fact, this is a major revolution in monetary policy.

Second, the “dot plot” released by the Fed was missing one dot. On the dot plot, each official is represented by a “dot,” and this time, the missing one was likely Walsh himself (who refused to submit an economic forecast).

The dot plot was introduced in 2012 during Bernanke’s tenure as a product of “transparency.” Before joining the Fed, Walsh criticized the dot plot in public essays and academic discussions, calling it “misleading to markets and making policy rigid.” In his debut, Walsh chose the most extreme and resolute method, not submitting his forecast, to challenge a 14-year Fed tradition. Since the Chair himself is not participating in this game, the authority of the other 18 officials’ forecasts will likely disappear in the future. The absence of this “dot” suggests that the Fed may gradually abandon the release of the dot plot.

Third, Walsh did not deliver a “loyalty pledge” to Trump, but instead gave it to the Federal Reserve (this meeting had zero dissenting votes). Walsh’s remarks were seen by Wall Street as “slightly hawkish,” resulting in market developments that were contrary to Trump’s wishes—US stocks fell across the board, and the 10-year US Treasury yield approached 4.5% again.

Powell turned the Fed into a press office, while Walsh is turning it back into a true central bank.

One thing worth noting is the dramatic three hours for gold after the decision: in the first hour, it plunged, losing $100 (UTC+8); in the second hour, it fell another $50 (UTC+8) on inertia; and in the final session, short sellers closed positions, causing a small rebound of $20 (UTC+8). This vividly showed the market’s fear and greed.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:56
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.

The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:46

After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

智通财经•2026/11/12 03:42
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%

For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

智通财经•2026/11/12 02:47
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%