Polymarket’s geopolitics category surges amid Iran war bets
Polymarket’s Iran-related prediction markets have become the platform’s biggest draw, with the flagship “US strikes Iran by…?” contract alone accumulating over $529 million in total volume by March 1, 2026. The surge didn’t happen in a vacuum. Escalating US-Iran military tensions in late February drove a frenzy of speculative activity, with sub-market trading volumes hitting $89.6 million on February 28 alone. Polymarket’s weekly volumes exceeded $425 million in early March, turning the platform into something resembling a real-time geopolitical sentiment engine.
The insider trading problem no one can ignore
On-chain analytics firm Bubblemaps identified clusters of newly created wallets that appeared to time their bets with uncanny precision, placing wagers immediately before key announcements about strikes and ceasefires. Those wallet clusters recorded profits between $1 million and $1.2 million.
By May 2026, Congress took notice. Lawmakers initiated probes targeting Polymarket specifically over concerns that insider trading involving government and military events was occurring on the platform. The investigations are focused on whether individuals with access to classified or privileged information about US military operations used prediction markets to profit from that knowledge.
Scale that keeps growing
By mid-June 2026, Polymarket was operating over 170 active markets associated with Iran, covering everything from strike timelines to ceasefire dates to regime change scenarios. Post-strike markets proved equally popular. Contracts focused on peace-related outcomes attracted between $170 million and $361 million in volume.
Polymarket still hasn’t launched a native token, though speculation about future platform upgrades and stability measures has circulated. The platform continues to operate on Polygon, processing bets denominated in USDC, which means every trade leaves a transparent on-chain trail.
What this means for prediction market investors
Congressional investigations tend to produce legislative outcomes. If lawmakers determine that prediction markets are being exploited by government insiders, the response could range from requiring KYC verification for large bets to outright restrictions on markets tied to military or national security events. Bubblemaps’ analysis showed that on-chain forensics can identify suspicious wallet clusters with relative ease.
Competitors like Kalshi, which operates under CFTC oversight, may benefit if Polymarket faces restrictions, positioning regulated alternatives as safer venues for institutional interest.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

