Argentina’s crypto community questions Javier Milei aide’s $200K Bitcoin claim
Manuel Adorni, Argentina’s cabinet chief and spokesman for President Javier Milei, recently amended his asset declarations to include roughly $513,000 in Bitcoin profits. He says the windfall came from a $200,000 investment made with his wife between 2013 and 2018, generating about $300,000 in gains that he simply hadn’t disclosed before.
The numbers don’t match
When analysts examined one of Adorni’s wallets, they found profits of roughly $60,000 from transactions made during 2017 and 2018. That’s a far cry from the $300,000 in gains he reported in his amended filings.
The amended declarations were filed around June 10-11, which is notable timing. Adorni is currently the subject of an illicit enrichment investigation being conducted by prosecutor Gerardo Pollicita and judge Ariel Lijo.
Several prominent early Bitcoin adopters in Argentina have raised a more fundamental objection: the practical reality of buying $200,000 worth of Bitcoin in Argentina during the period Adorni references would have been extraordinarily difficult. In 2013 and 2014, Argentina’s Bitcoin market was tiny. Liquidity was limited, over-the-counter options were scarce, and moving that kind of money into crypto would have required navigating a landscape that barely existed.
Adding another wrinkle: Adorni had previously suggested his Bitcoin entry point was around 2014 to 2015, which conflicts with the 2013 start date in his current filings.
A pattern of crypto controversy
This isn’t the first time the Milei administration has found itself entangled in crypto-related scrutiny. The $LIBRA memecoin episode, which also remains under investigation, already put the government’s relationship with digital assets under a microscope.
The investigation by Pollicita and Lijo appears to be examining apparent discrepancies in Adorni’s declared financial status more broadly, not just the Bitcoin claims. The amended crypto disclosures are one piece of a larger puzzle about how the cabinet chief accumulated his wealth.
The gap between Adorni’s claimed profits and what blockchain analysis actually shows — roughly $60,000 versus $300,000 — is the kind of discrepancy that’s hard to explain away with rounding errors or wallet complexity. Either there are additional wallets and transactions that haven’t been examined yet, or the numbers in his filings are significantly inflated.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

